| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+Interps: |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+A. If the affirmative parametricizes the resolution and does not defend generic links to the whole resolution, then they must disclose the plan text of the aff they are reading on the NDCA case wiki at least half an hour before the round. |
|
4 |
+A. Debaters who claim the negative must defend the “converse” of the resolution must clarify, in the form of a text in the AC, a list of possible violations of the interp. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+A. the Affirmative must only include paradigmatic theory spikes in the AC, meaning reasons why theory is drop the arg/debater, competing interps/reasonability, and RVI’s, or meta theory arguments pertaining to the theory debate, not substance. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+A. All debate positions must only contain secular arguments, or arguments that are not warranted by religious beliefs, UNLESS the debater presenting the position receives consent from the audience, judge(s), and opponent before the round. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+A. All 1AR interps must be disclosed on the opponents wiki at least 15 min prior to the round. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+A. if the aff/neg justifies a pre-fiat role of the ballot other than the one the affirmative justifies, he or she must have a text contextualizing |
|
13 |
+A()what the role of the judge should be delineated via spacing or bolding. |
|
14 |
+B()how to weigh links back to this role of the ballot within the text clearly |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+A. may not read advocacy shift as sole standard for interp. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+A.may only read paradigmatic spikes in the 1AC |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+A. must disclose burden structure |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+A. may not read descriptive standards |