| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Reject the aff’s call for free speech and protest. These calls of disruptions cannot be done out loud in the open inside of public spaces like colleges. A corrupted society will only use that information to co-opt and destroy radical political movements. There is no freedom over the intercom. ==== |
|
2 |
+Tuck and Yang ’14 (Tuck, E. and Yang, K.W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In D. Paris and M. T. Winn (Eds.) Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-248). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.) |
|
3 |
+ Paula Gunn Allen (1998) notes that for many Indigenous peoples, " |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+them as social science research. It is enough that we know them. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====The alternative is to maintain the movement by keeping mouths shut. When we keep the radical politics within the community we prevent white society from destroying our political movement. Vote negative to maintain the secrecy of the movement. ==== |
|
9 |
+Tuck and Yang ’14 (Tuck, E. and Yang, K.W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In D. Paris and M. T. Winn (Eds.) Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-248). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.) 77 |
|
10 |
+261There are three concurrent dimensions of refusal in Simpson’s analysis—in Simpson’s words, |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+refusal regards limits on knowledge as productive, as indeed a good thing. |