| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,25 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Analysis of agency key to moral obligations because ability is a constraint on culpability. You wouldn’t blame a tornado for destroying a house because it doesn’t have the ability to do otherwise even though it creates a negative consequence. ==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====And, only constitutivism provides an internal standard of success which solves infinite regress.==== |
|
5 |
+**Katsafanas** Paul (Boston University) "Constitutivism about practical reasons" March 6th 2014 JW |
|
6 |
+Normative claims make demands on us: they tell us which actions to perform and |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+not invoke external facts in order to legitimate their claim to authority.15 |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====The constitutive aim of universities is to promote education, not guarantee free speech==== |
|
12 |
+**Fish 94** (Stanley There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and it’s a Good Thing, Too Oxford U Press pp. 102-19 https://www.english.upenn.edu/~~cavitch/pdf-library/Fish'FreeSpeech.pdf DOA 12/17/16) CW |
|
13 |
+Take the case of universities and colleges. Could it be the purpose of such |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+paraphrase Milton, the institution sacrifice itself to one of its accidental features. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+====And, free speech is never in and of itself an absolute good, otherwise we would just spew gibberish. Free speech is only good because people care about what they say, not that they can say things. That means free speech is only good through its consequences, but you never justify why consequences matter.==== |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====Hate speech intrinsically and intentionally used to degrade certain people==== |
|
22 |
+**Garrett 99** (Deanna M. Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus https://www.uvm.edu/~~vtconn/v20/garrett.html DOA 12/17/16) CW |
|
23 |
+Restricting Hate Speech Hate speech is not defined by "isolated incidents" or " |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+shock" of racist speech systematically preempts response. (p. 143) |