| ... |
... |
@@ -1,5
+1,144 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-facebook is Andrew Overing |
| 2 |
|
-email is anovering@gmail.com |
|
1 |
+=Slumdog Skillionare= |
| 3 |
3 |
|
| 4 |
|
-If cites aren't up, contact me and I'll disclose |
| 5 |
|
-I'll disclose roughly every two rounds. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+==Part 1 is Framework == |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====Prefer a pragmatic conception of truth – we don't verify every truth, just use what's useful for us. James^^ ^^==== |
|
8 |
+You and I consider ~~the object on the wall~~ to be a "clock." Although no |
|
9 |
+AND |
|
10 |
+if everything runs on harmoniously,~~W~~e are so surethatverification is possible that we omit it. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====Some judgments are irrefutably normative- only revisionary intuitionism meets. Parfit:==== |
|
14 |
+On What Matters V2, 2011 books.google.com/books?isbn=0191613452 |
|
15 |
+To introduce this argument, I shall sum up some of my claims. ( |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+whether, when considering these beliefs, we and others could rationally disagree. |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+====That implies consequentialism. Sinnot-Armstrong: |
|
21 |
+Walter Sinnott-Armstrong http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/ |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Consequentialism also might be supported by an inference to the best explanation of our moral |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+ argue in this way, it still might work for rule consequentialists (such as Hooker 2000).==== |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+==Part 2 is the Plan Text== |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+====The Parliament of India will ban all domestic nuclear production. I reserve the right to clarify.==== |
|
32 |
+**Parameswaran 11 is the solvency advocate ** |
|
33 |
+India does not need nuclear energy: Top scientist. Interview with Dr. M. P. Parameswaran, former lead scientist of the Indian AEC and India's first phd in nuclear science. 11-7-11 |
|
34 |
+http://www.dianuke.org/india-does-not-need-nuclear-energy-top-scientist/ |
|
35 |
+One of the pioneer nuclear scientists in the country says that India can very well |
|
36 |
+AND |
|
37 |
+Indo-Pak war, they probably don't have good backfiles on it. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+==Advantage 1 is Colonization== |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+====India has been expanding its uranium mining, which displaces indigenous peoples in an act of violent colonization==== |
|
44 |
+Bhadra 11 |
|
45 |
+**"INDIA'S NUCLEAR POWER PROBLEM" Cairo Review. Monamie Bhadra ~~phd Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes (CSPO). She is currently a junior fellow of the American Institute of Indian Studies~~** |
|
46 |
+**After the U.S.-India nuclear deal, the central government set its ** |
|
47 |
+**AND** |
|
48 |
+**land, to which they have cultural, economic, and emotional attachments.** |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+====To acquire land, Indian government forcibly evicts entire villages, raping women and homes as they do so==== |
|
52 |
+Bhadra 11 |
|
53 |
+**"INDIA'S NUCLEAR POWER PROBLEM" Cairo Review. Monamie Bhadra ~~phd Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes (CSPO). She is currently a junior fellow of the American Institute of Indian Studies~~** |
|
54 |
+**The neo-liberal policies that brought wealth to technopolises like Bangalore and Chennai sidestepped ** |
|
55 |
+**AND** |
|
56 |
+**included the rape and murder of an eighteen-year-old activist.** |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+==Advantage 2 is Radiation== |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+====Mining towns turn people into radiated bodies – thousands dying from cancer and disease==== |
|
63 |
+Bhadra 11 |
|
64 |
+**"INDIA'S NUCLEAR POWER PROBLEM" Cairo Review. Monamie Bhadra ~~phd Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes (CSPO). She is currently a junior fellow of the American Institute of Indian Studies~~** |
|
65 |
+**The Jharkhand Organization Against Radiation (JOAR) in Jadugoda frames its grievances quite differently** |
|
66 |
+**AND** |
|
67 |
+**, including mice, monkeys and rabbits were disappearing from the area."11** |
|
68 |
+ |
|
69 |
+ |
|
70 |
+==Advantage 3 is Meltdowns == |
|
71 |
+ |
|
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+====Ending nuclear production avoids all risk of a meltdown and spurs transition to other energies==== |
|
74 |
+**Parameswaran 11** |
|
75 |
+India does not need nuclear energy: Top scientist. Interview with Dr. M. P. Parameswaran, former lead scientist of the Indian AEC and India's first phd in nuclear science. 11-7-11 |
|
76 |
+http://www.dianuke.org/india-does-not-need-nuclear-energy-top-scientist/ |
|
77 |
+One of the pioneer nuclear scientists in the country says that India can very well |
|
78 |
+AND |
|
79 |
+. They thought that the opposition could be steamrolled," said Dr Parameswaran. |
|
80 |
+ |
|
81 |
+ |
|
82 |
+**====The newest plants are going to be bigger and more dangerous====** |
|
83 |
+**Jain 12** |
|
84 |
+Neeraj Jain, convenor of Lokayat, a social activist group in Pune, Maharashtra, that is part of the all-India National Alliance of Anti-Nuclea |
|
85 |
+Movements (NAAM). Jain, who trained in electrical engineering, is the author of Nuclear Energy: Technology from Hell (Aakar Books, Delhi 2012). India: 'Nuclear energy is not a national issue – it is a global issue' — anti-nuclear movement gains momentum http://links.org.au/node/3049 |
|
86 |
+Additionally, there are several new factors that are contributing to the growing intensity of |
|
87 |
+AND |
|
88 |
+the consequence of a nuclear accident would be devastating and of unimaginable proportions. |
|
89 |
+ |
|
90 |
+ |
|
91 |
+===Earthquakes/Tsunamis=== |
|
92 |
+ |
|
93 |
+ |
|
94 |
+====India's building on earthquake-prone ground==== |
|
95 |
+**DNA 11** |
|
96 |
+Should India go ahead with the Jaitapur nuclear power plant after Japan's nuclear reactor meltdown? Saturday, Mar 12, 2011, 19:32 IST |
|
97 |
+In the aftermath of the earthquake of magnitude 8.9 in Japan, the |
|
98 |
+AND |
|
99 |
+intensity from 2.9 to 6.3 on the Richter scale. |
|
100 |
+ |
|
101 |
+ |
|
102 |
+====And tsunami risks==== |
|
103 |
+Ehtisham 13 |
|
104 |
+Is India's nuclear arsenal safe? By Hasan Ehtisham (MSc in Defence and Strategic studies) |
|
105 |
+In India, nuclear facilities on coastlines are exposed to natural disasters like the monstrous |
|
106 |
+AND |
|
107 |
+exposure that were reported at Tarapur, which is India's first nuclear station. |
|
108 |
+ |
|
109 |
+ |
|
110 |
+====A big meltdown would kill millions==== |
|
111 |
+Wasserman '02 (Harvey, Senior Editor – Free Press, Earth Island Journal, Spring, www.earthisland.org/eijournal/new_articles.cfm?articleID=457andjournalID=63) |
|
112 |
+The intense radioactive heat within today's operating reactors is the hottest anywhere on the planet |
|
113 |
+AND |
|
114 |
+core of our life and of all future generations must be shut down. |
|
115 |
+ |
|
116 |
+ |
|
117 |
+==Advantage 4 is Nuke War== |
|
118 |
+ |
|
119 |
+ |
|
120 |
+====India is expanding their nuclear weapons arsenal. Pillalamarri 15==== |
|
121 |
+Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. (Pillalamarri is a graduate at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University, is a columnist at the Diplomat and the National Interest.) "India's Nuclear-Weapons Program: 5 Things You Need to Know." The National Interest. N.p., 22 Apr. 2015. Web. 13 Sept. 2016. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/indias-nuclear-weapons-program-5-things-you-need-know-12697?page=show. BS |
|
122 |
+India is expanding its stock of nuclear weapons, but not as fast as Pakistan |
|
123 |
+AND |
|
124 |
+other nuclear material for weapons. India hopes to soon operate thorium reactors. |
|
125 |
+ |
|
126 |
+ |
|
127 |
+===Indo-Pak War=== |
|
128 |
+ |
|
129 |
+ |
|
130 |
+====Expansion of weapons is already causing an arms race between India and Pakistan; it's likely to escalate. Barno and Bensahel 15==== |
|
131 |
+Barno, David, and Nora Bensahel. (Barno is a distinguished practitioner in residence at the School of International Service at American University. Bensahel, Ph.D. is a distinguished scholar in residence at the School of International Service at American University They are both nonresident senior fellows at the Brent Scowcroft Center at the Atlantic Council.)"A Nuclear War between India and Pakistan Is a Very Real Possibility." Quartz. N.p., 04 Nov. 2015. Web. 14 Sept. 2016. http://qz.com/541502/a-nuclear-war-between-india-and-pakistan-is-a-very-real-possibility/. BS |
|
132 |
+These stakes are even higher, and more dangerous, today. Since 2004, |
|
133 |
+AND |
|
134 |
+between the two national security advisers was cancelled after disagreements about Kashmiri separatists. |
|
135 |
+ |
|
136 |
+ |
|
137 |
+===China-India War=== |
|
138 |
+ |
|
139 |
+ |
|
140 |
+====India's expanding arsenal is influencing more aggressive foreign policy with China which caues border disputes that would escalate. Ahmed 14==== |
|
141 |
+Ahmed, Ali. (Ahmed, PhD is a freelance analyst) "China and India: Nationalism and Nuclear Risk." The Diplomat. The Diplomat, 18 Dec. 2014. Web. 14 Sept. 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2014/12/china-and-india-nationalism-and-nuclear-risk/. BS |
|
142 |
+To be sure, the two states have considerable depth in both territory and forces |
|
143 |
+AND |
|
144 |
+in the deterrence logic of the "threat that leaves something to chance." |