Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[31]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[31]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-22 02:57:46.846
	1	+2017-02-22 02:57:46.0

Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,103 @@
	1	+==Observation 1 - Framing==
	2	+====The standard is utilitarianism. Prefer because:====
	3	+====1. The resolutional question is based on weighing rights – this necessitates util.====
	4	+Brandt, professor of philosophy @ U Mich. 1992
	5	+Richard. Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge University Press. Pg 199.
	6	+Before turning to ... in what circumstances).
	7	+
	8	+====2. Policy-making is based on an obligation to citizens’ interests that necessitates evaluating impacts.====
	9	+Woller Gary, Economics Professor at BYU, “Policy Currents,” June, http://apsapolicysection.org/vol7_2/72.pdf
	10	+Moreover, virtually all ... advantage of society.
	11	+
	12	+====3. Failure to evaluate impacts creates tunnel vision that generates evil and political irrelevance.====
	13	+Isaac, PhD.Yale, Prof. PoliSci Indiana-Bloomington, dir. Center for the Study of Democracy and Public Life, 02
	14	+(Jeffrey C. Isaac, PhD.Yale, Prof. PoliSci Indiana-Bloomington, dir. Center for the Study of Democracy and Public Life, Spring 2002, “End, Means, and Politics,” Dissent Magazine, vol. 49, no. 2)
	15	+As writers such ... undermines political effectiveness.
	16	+
	17	+====Prioritize the smallest risk of extinction—the value of the lives saved is massive and outweighs.====
	18	+Bostrom 13—philosophy @ University of Oxford (Nick, 2013, Global Policy, Volume 4, Issue 1, “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority,” http://www.existential-risk.org/concept.pdf,)
	19	+Holding probability constant, ... such an action.10
	20	+
	21	+====Solving extinction is thus a pre-req to the Neg’s framework.====
	22	+
	23	+==Contention 1 – Status Quo==
	24	+
	25	+====College speech regulations on the rise and it’s a slippery slope – threatens journalism, academic freedom, and student expression. Plan key to checking widespread censorship.====
	26	+Sanders, Chris. "CENSORSHIP 101: ANTI-HAZELWOOD LAWS AND THE PRESERVATION OF FREE SPEECH AT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES." University of Alabama Law School, 2006, www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/ sanders.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan. 2017. WC
	27	+====*Edited for ableist language====
	28	+Post-Hazelwood censorship ... in its wake.
	29	+
	30	+====We’re at the breaking point – censorship risks normalizing it in the real world.====
	31	+Schuman 12-8 (Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html)
	32	+Well, here’s some ... censorship is acceptable.
	33	+
	34	+====It’s all or nothing – regulations inevitably spread and threaten freedoms in the real world – history proves.====
	35	+Sanders 2 (Chris. "CENSORSHIP 101: ANTI-HAZELWOOD LAWS AND THE PRESERVATION OF FREE SPEECH AT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES." University of Alabama Law School, 2006, www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/ sanders.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan. 2017.) WC
	36	+====*Brackets for clarity.====
	37	+Because Hazelwood, intentionally ... an earlier time.
	38	+
	39	+====This is a disad to all PIC’s – minor restrictions inevitably spread.====
	40	+
	41	+==Plan==
	42	+
	43	+====In the United States, public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.====
	44	+
	45	+==Advantage 1 – Journalism==
	46	+
	47	+====College is a training ground for journalists – plan key to a responsible media.====
	48	+Sanders 3 (Chris. "CENSORSHIP 101: ANTI-HAZELWOOD LAWS AND THE PRESERVATION OF FREE SPEECH AT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES." University of Alabama Law School, 2006, www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume2058/Issue201/ sanders.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan. 2017.) WC
	49	+Because Hazelwood, intentionally ... an earlier time.
	50	+
	51	+====Irresponsible media is the internal link to a host of impacts – Trump rise proves.====
	52	+Boyle, Ev. USC Annenberg Center on Communication Leadership and Policy, 2016, communicationleadership.usc.edu/news/ yes-the-media-bears-some-responsibility-for-the-rise-of-donald-trumpE2808A-E2 808Aheres-proof/. Accessed 23 Jan. 2017. Ev Boyle is the Associate Director of CCLP and the founding director of Civic Tech USC. WC "Yes, the media bears some responsibility for the rise of Donald Trump—here’s proof."
	53	+Since announcing his ... other single candidate.
	54	+
	55	+====Trump is the tip of the iceberg – free, effective media key to checking the rise of even more dangerous demagogues.====
	56	+Chotiner, Isaac. "Trump Is Unhinged. But A Better, Cooler, More Polished Demagogue Could Rise In His Wake.". Slate Magazine. July 22, 2016. Isaac Chotiner is the Executive Editor of The New Republic, LLC, an assistant editor and reporter-researcher at Bloomberg, and a contributor at Slate and the Washington Post. He has a degree in political science from UC Davis. WC
	57	+The fact that ... abuse of power.
	58	+
	59	+====Failure to check demagoguery guarantees environmental apocalypse and extinction.====
	60	+Haraldsson, Hrafnkell, and Noam Chomsky. "Noam Chomsky Says GOP is the ‘Most Dangerous Organization in World History’." Politicus, 15 Nov. 2016, www.politicususa.com/2016/11/15/ noam-chomsky-gop-most-dangerous-organization-world-history.html. Accessed 24 Jan. 2017. WC
	61	+In an interview ... accept its consequences.
	62	+
	63	+==Advantage 2 – Psychoanalysis==
	64	+
	65	+====Discrimination is inevitable – speech restrictions just force people to bottle up their feelings– drives hate under ground and re-entrenches prejudice.====
	66	+Leonard 93 (Leonard, James. "Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University." Ohio Northern University Law Review 19 (1993): 759-782.. Jul 9 19:54:18 2016. Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University. Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org).DA=7/9/16.) WC
	67	+ Perhaps the most ... rather than hide it.
	68	+
	69	+====This link turns your K’s and DA’s – speech is the only alternative to real world violence.====
	70	+Schwartz 86
	71	+Schwartz, Joel. “Freud and Freedom of Speech.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4, 1986, pp. 1227–1248. www.jstor.org/stable/ 1960865. WC
	72	+In this essay ... is less adequate.
	73	+
	74	+==Contention 2 – Solvency==
	75	+
	76	+====Counter-speech best solves hate – empirics.====
	77	+Davis, Alexander. "The Freedom of Speech in Public Forums on College Campuses: A Single-Site Case Study on Pushing the Boundaries of the Freedom of Speech." Digital Commons, June 2016, digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1119andcontext=joursp. Accessed 26 Jan. 2017. WC
	78	+All experts agreed ... combat the issue.
	79	+
	80	+====Empirics go AFF – none of their hate speech args will include a comprehensive analysis of how speech codes have historically affected minorities.====
	81	+Strossen ’90 (Nadine Strossen – ACLU; Professor of Law at NYU, Duke University School of Law, “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555)
	82	+It is particularly ... religion of peace.
	83	+
	84	+====Resentment of speech codes kills their solvency.====
	85	+Leonard 2 (James. "Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University." Ohio Northern University Law Review 19 (1993): 759-782. WC *Brackets for clarity)
	86	+In fact, the ... against university paternalism.
	87	+
	88	+====Speech codes cause racialized violence.====
	89	+Leonard 3 (James. "Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University." Ohio Northern University Law Review 19 (1993): 759-782. WC *Brackets for clarity)
	90	+In the long ... of this attitude.
	91	+Restricting speech just glorifies it and turns bigots into martyrs – empirics prove.
	92	+Leonard 4 (James. "Killing with Kindness: Speech Codes in the American University." Ohio Northern University Law Review 19 (1993): 759-782. WC *Brackets for clarity)
	93	+A strategy of ... speakers into martyrs.
	94	+
	95	+====Hold CP’s to a high threshold – every card in this contention is a sufficient disad to kill their solvency.====
	96	+
	97	+==Underview==
	98	+
	99	+===Interpretation===
	100	+====At the 2017 UNLV tournament in the LD division the Neg only gets PICs when the Aff doesn’t defend the whole resolution.====
	101	+
	102	+===Net Bens===
	103	+====Ommitted====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-22 02:57:48.574

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kris Kaya

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Carmel Valley CC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+31

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Logan Carter Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JanFeb 1AC ~-~- Boring Version

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+UNLV