Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[31]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[31]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,122 +1,0 @@
1		-Contention One: Planning
2		-Plan: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
3		-Plan: Public colleges ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
4		-Plan: Public universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
5		-Plan: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech if and only if the Republic of Cuba agrees to lift the embargo in order to facilitate exploration of the oceans of the Earth beyond the Earth’s mesosphere.
6		-Plan: Obama should go swimming. Just kidding, wrong topic.
7		-Plan: This plan has been redacted by Logan WC.
8		-Plan: Public colleges and universities should plan to not restrict its plans for not restricting plans to restrict constitutionally protected speech.
9		-Plan: the Affirmative should win
10		-Plan: the Negative should lose
11		-Plan: All of the above.
12		-Plan: None of the above.
13		-Plan: Tear down the wall.
14		-
15		-All plans are double fiated. We reserve the right to clarify.
16		-
17		-
18		-Even if we lose the double fiat debate, you evaluate our plan texts in a vacuum and vote aff on the net benefit of amusement and ridiculousness, which are the key internal to fun.
19		-
20		-
21		-Contention Two: Hegge-money
22		-
23		-
24		-Hege high but not high enough. Curtailing surveillance on heg k2 heg. Hege really good. It’s also a D rule.
25		-
26		-
27		-And, Nuke War.
28		-Khalilzad, 95 – God of Policy Debate (Zalmay, "Losing the Moment? The United States and the World After the Cold War" The Washington Quarterly, RETHINKING GRAND STRATEGY; Vol. 18, No. 2; Pg. 84)
29		-Under the third option, the United States would seek to retain global leadership and
30		-AND
31		-to global stability than a bipolar or a multipolar balance of power system.
32		-
33		-
34		-Hegemony solves multiple conflicts for extinction and is sustainable, star this card, then star it again, draw a circle around it, and then a box around that circle.
35		-Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wolforth 13 – ALL THE QUALIFICATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ("Lean Forward: In Defense of American Engagement", January/February 2013, Foreign Affairs, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138468/stephen-g-brooks-g-john-ikenberry-and-william-c-wohlforth/lean-forward)
36		-
37		-Since the end of World War II, the United States has pursued
38		-AND
39		-an engaged and liberal leading power. The results could well be disastrous.
40		-
41		-
42		-Contention Three: Econ
43		-
44		-
45		-Econ going to be low. Voting aff k2 econ. Econ really good
46		-
47		-
48		-And…. Extinction. We have literally analyzed everything we could possible analyze and then re-analyzed our analysis. This card has over 9,000 warrants.
49		-Royal, 10 – actually concludes Neg but for some reason everyone has only read the introduction (Jedediah, Director of Cooperative Threat Reduction – U.S. Department of Defense, "Economic Integration, Economic Signaling and the Problem of Economic Crises", Economics of War and Peace: Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives, Ed. Goldsmith and Brauer, p. 213-215)
50		-black highlighting
51		-Less intuitive is how periods of economic decline may increase the
52		-AND
53		-not featured prominently in the economic-security debate and deserves more attention.
54		-
55		-
56		-Boom goes the dynamite.
57		-Harris and Burrows 9 – Swag the Room (Mathew, PhD European History at Cambridge, counselor in the National Intelligence Council (NIC) and Jennifer, member of the NIC’s Long Range Analysis Unit "Revisiting the Future: Geopolitical Effects of the Financial Crisis" http://www.ciaonet.org/journals/twq/v32i2/f'0016178'13952.pdf, AM)
58		-Of course, the report encompasses more than economics and indeed believes the future is
59		-AND
60		-within and between states in a more dog-eat-dog world.
61		-
62		-
63		-Contention Four: Solvency
64		-
65		-
66		-We solve everything because. Like seriously we promise if you just vote aff all the problems will go away. Also, we double fiat ensures no disads. Also put away your multiple CPs and K alts because conditionality is bad.
67		-
68		-Contention Five: new advantage:
69		-
70		-
71		-Contention 5 is contention 3 —- contention 3 is RESOLVENCY.
72		-
73		-
74		-We didn’t invent the rainy day; we just own the best umbrella.
75		-
76		-
77		-Wait, the aff isn’t big enough:
78		-Let’s supersize it. Double down but keep up. Be safe but take risks. Actions may speak louder than words but a pen is stronger than the sword. "Americans may have no identity, but they do have wonderful teeth."
79		-
80		-
81		-Re-plan but keep it secret keep it safe.
82		-
83		-
84		-I would have got Dorothy and her little dog too if it weren’t for those meddling kids and their fracking toaster.
85		-
86		-
87		-The last time I was you we danced through infinity.
88		-
89		-
90		-We’re pre-post-modern but we aren’t modern.
91		-
92		-
93		-Have I ever told you that I’m a diehard JB fan?
94		-
95		-
96		-The heart of god tasted good.
97		-
98		-Extra Cards!
99		-
100		-Debate is characterized by an oversaturation of information – too many cards, not enough time; too many causes, not enough effects; too many messages, no meaning – this results in nihilism
101		-Baudrillard, 9 (Jean, "The Transparency of Evil," 2009, 34-36)eek
102		-This process is not a critical one: crisis is always a matter of causality
103		-AND
104		-What we call crisis is in fact a foreshadowing of this absolute inertia .
105		-
106		-reverse the system.
107		-Baudrillard, 76 (Symbolic Exchange and Death, p. 2-5, Sage)eek
108		-Everywhere, in every domain, a single form predominates: reversibility, cyclical reversal
109		-AND
110		-must be possible to extract them, one by one, from discourse.
111		-
112		-don’t control our information you fascists
113		-A Hacker Manifesto, 4 (McKenzie Wark; has Ph.D. from Murdoch University, Professor of Culture and Media at Eugene Lang College, Professor of Liberal Studies at the New School for Social Research; "A Hacker Manifesto," Harvard University Press, paragraph 24-47)eek
114		-Information, like land or capital, becomes a form of property monopolized by a
115		-AND
116		-divided world to produce its own overcoming comes not a moment too soon.
117		-
118		-====Double fiat means double the speaks!====
119		-Clegg et al., 7 – one of the most published and cited authors Organization Studies, Research Director of the Centre for Management and Organisation Studies, PhD in Management, former Foundation Professor at the University of Western Sydney, and holds multiple Visiting Fellow and Professor at several Think Tanks and Universities (Stewart Clegg, Martin Kornberger, Carl Rhodes, "Organizational ethics, decision making, undecidability," 2007, The Sociological Review, 55:2, 393-409)eek
120		-In this paper we develop a conceptualisation of organizational decision-making as a practice
121		-AND
122		-evil and the possibility of its repetition will haunt organizations of all kinds.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-01-23 02:21:12.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-28

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Logan Carter Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JanFeb 1AC ~-~- Topical Baudrillard

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--