| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Their use of fancy multi-syllable buzzwords and impressive-sounding claims is a ploy to cover for arguments so vague they're meaningless. And don't let them hide behind "our cards use these terms" – they can write the tags any way they want. In short: they are serving you a big helping of pseudo-profound bullshit. Pennycook et al 1,==== |
|
2 |
+Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.html, Yale University, New Haven with expertise in Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Science, On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit, Judgment and Decision Making, brackets in original |
|
3 |
+The Oxford English ... rather than instructive. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+====Validating bullshit creates an unwitting appreciation for vague, meaningless ideas to the point where we don't know it's bullshit anymore. Sperber,==== |
|
6 |
+Sperber 2010 May 6, http://www.academia.edu/2989467/The_Guru_Effect, the Guru Effect, Dan Sperber is a French social and cognitive scientist. His most influential work has been in the fields of cognitive anthropology and linguistic pragmatics |
|
7 |
+The writing of ... for the appreciation. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Acceptance of bullshit leads to a breakdown of conflict detection, reasoning, and decision-making. Pennycook et al 2,==== |
|
10 |
+Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.html, Yale University, New Haven with expertise in Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Science, On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit, Judgment and Decision Making, brackets in original |
|
11 |
+The second mechanism ... bullshit from non-bullshit. |