Changes for page Lincoln NE Root Aff
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 13 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-08 17:03:03. 01 +2017-01-08 17:03:03.634
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -(This is all of the new evidence) 2 - 3 -====We do this: Crip spaces. What that means, we let Chandler explain,==== 4 -Eliza Chandler, http://nomorepotlucks.org/site/cripping-community-new-meanings-of-disability-and-community/, Cripping Community: 5 -New Meanings of Disability and Community, No More Potlucks, doctorial fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and is a Senior Doctorial Fellow at New College, U of T. She teaches courses in Disability Studies at New College and at OISE/UT 6 -Ableism, to be ... be in community. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - Cripistemologies v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -====The issues that the negative point out are not even constitutionally protected speech on the site of the campus - in general, as their evidence suggests, it is constitutionally protected, but in university is not. We apply the O’Brien test, as explained by the Supreme Court in United States v. O’Brien,==== 2 -Supreme Court, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 27 May 1968, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/obrien.html, as a note: the O’Brien case was specific to draft resistance, but the O’Brien test is still in effect 3 -We cannot accept ... for violating it. 4 - 5 -Perm: do both; not mutually exclusive with the affirmative and thus no competition. If they say they have no counterplan and so it can’t be permed, vote them down because they have become a moving target in the debate - that’s a voter for education and fairness because we no longer have a meaningful debate when they change the topic at any point. 6 - 7 -Analytics 8 - 9 -Analytics 10 - 11 -Analytics 12 - 13 -Perm solves, extend their evidence. 14 - 15 -Analytics - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - OBrien - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,41 +1,0 @@ 1 -Standard - technological and societal advancement. Three reasons: 2 - 3 -====1. There is a moral imperative to advance technologically.==== 4 -Stephen Robert Garner, 2007, Transhumanism and the imago Dei: Narratives of apprehension and hope, Ph.D. thesis 5 -Beneficence as moral ... in the world. 6 - 7 -====2. Even moderate gains in technology have giant real-world impacts.==== 8 -Stuart Russel, Ph.D. in computer science from Stanford in 1986, professor at UC Berkeley; Peter Norvig, previous head of Computational Sciences at NASA, Ph.D. in computer science at UC Berkeley; Chapter 27: AI: The Present and the Future, page 1051, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach Third Edition 9 -We can expect ... to be done. 10 - 11 -3. Analytic. 12 - 13 -Contention 1. Robots. 14 - 15 -====Universities serve as a conglomeration of researchers - private and federal grants prove.==== 16 -University of Arizona Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 2017, Funding, https://ai.arizona.edu/about/funding 17 -Much of the ... by our sponsors. 18 - 19 -====History proves.==== 20 -National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President of the United States, October 2016, THE NATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN, https://www.nitrd.gov/PUBS/national_ai_rd_strategic_plan.pdf 21 -In 1956, researchers ... and public welfare. 22 - 23 -====Robots and AI necessarily require external stimulus. Context is necessary, wherein...==== 24 -Masafumi Oizumi , Larissa Albantakis , Giulio Tononi, May 8, 2014, From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0, PLOS Computational Biology, http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588 25 -The self-referential nature ... more detail elsewhere. 26 - 27 -====IBM Watson proves - more data key.==== 28 -Jo Best has been covering IT for the best part of a decade for publications including silicon.com, Guardian Government Computing and ZDNet in both London and Sydney, IBM Watson: The inside story of how the Jeopardy-winning supercomputer was born, and what it wants to do next, 2013, http://www.techrepublic.com/article/ibm-watson-the-inside-story-of-how-the-jeopardy-winning-supercomputer-was-born-and-what-it-wants-to-do-next/ 29 -For that, IBM ... substantial," said Horn. 30 - 31 -====Additionally, the only way to achieve a contextualisation of actions is through emotional development.==== 32 -JC Torres, degrees in Philosophy and Computer Science, Senior editor at SlashGear, AI needs to be more emotional, 20 Dec 2016, https://www.slashgear.com/ai-personal-assistants-need-to-understand-emotions-20468093/ 33 -AI assistant and ... intelligent as well. 34 - 35 -Analytic. 36 - 37 -====More speech good. Speak out. Have the robots speak out, too.==== 38 -American Civil Liberties Union, HATE SPEECH ON CAMPUS, no date, https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus 39 -How much we ... are thereby weakened." 40 - 41 -3 analytics at the end. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-29 16:11:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northeast - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - Robots - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northstar
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,37 +1,0 @@ 1 -====I decided to disclose the entirety of the NC that I wrote as opposed to a barebones outline. This is it.==== 2 - 3 -I have not seen many arguments in debate that are outright abusive or are outright hateful or are outright ignorant - I have seen people talk about that racial profiling is necessary by a slip of tongue, a long story when they were talking about qualified immunity, but I have not seen someone who unapologetically decides to spew hateful rhetoric after being told that it is hateful and fundamentally wrong. Danny has done that. 4 - 5 -First, extend across their arguments that specific types of speech - namely hate speech and speech that propagates rape myths - being harmful to their core; the substance of the words have a material impact, wherein there is emotional trauma that is invoked. Their cards make this explicitly clear. 6 - 7 -Second, remember the specific linguistic choices that the NC had made - they talked about ‘victims’, not only in their cards (which may be forgivable), but also in their analytics - specifically in analytic that wasn't typed - it was a quote from their analytics, obviously. 8 - 9 -That just begs the question of what a victim is, and what it means to be a victim- I am a victim, and that is all I am. Victim because I am weak, because I didn’t fight back, because I am passive, because I can’t speak for myself, because a label is more descriptive than my being. Victim because you know me better than I know myself. 10 - 11 -Mama volunteered at the Friendship Home while she was in college, because she was a ‘victim’ when she was younger. I asked her why she helps those ‘victims’, unknowing, and she told me to never say that word again. She said that they are not victims, they are people, and that I need to emphasize that they are people - they are not objects of a conversation, totally immaterial, but they are people that are trying - if not materially, then spiritually - and that they have wants, fears, wishes, hopes, dreams … just like I do. Mom taught me something important, and I have tried to make the world a better place by telling others, and teaching others, what she taught me that day. 12 - 13 -If you’ve never heard the Grammys version of Kanye’s _Hey Mama_, give it a listen, it’s powerful. Here’s an excerpt: 14 - Seven years old, caught you with tears in your eyes 15 - Cuz a man cheatin, telling you lies, then I started to cry 16 - As we knelt on the kitchen floor 17 - I said mommy Imma love you till you don't hurt no more 18 - And when I'm older, you ain’t gotta work no more 19 - And Imma get you that mansion that we couldn't afford 20 - See you're, unbreakable, unmistakable 21 - Highly capable, lady that's makin loot 22 - A livin legend too, just look at what heaven do 23 - Send us an angel, and I thank you (Hey Mama) 24 - 25 -Thanks, Mama. For teaching me - for trying - for being a survivor, of being a person, of being a fighter, who’s unbreakable to her core. 26 - 27 -Sadly, it appears that Danny is unwilling to change his language. Why? I asked his coach that very question, after he had lost to an argument about his rhetoric two times, and they said that he was just unwilling. Why are people so unwilling to change their language, when they have been told by three people - maybe more - that their language is harmful and it leads to real harms against others? I ask myself that - and you should be asking yourself that when evaluating who ‘won’ the debate round. 28 - 29 -I suppose it is time to move onto the debate world, and with that there are two arguments being presented: 30 - 31 -====A - To be a “victim” is to become an object, losing the common humanity. Dunn 2004,==== 32 -Jennifer L. Dunn Professor of Sociology at Southern Illinois University, "“Victims” and “Survivors”: Emerging Vocabularies of Motive for “Battered Women Who Stay”" Sociological Inquiry Vol. 75, Issue 1, p. 1-30(Dec 2004) FD 33 -“Barry discusses what she calls “victimism”: “In creating new definitions we always risk incorporating the rigidity in the new that exemplified the old . . . Creating the role and status of the victim is the practice I call victimism . . . creates a framework for others to know them her not as a person but as a victim, someone to whom violence was done . . . Victimism is an objectification which establishes new standards for defining experience; those standards dismiss any question of will, and deny that the people are woman even while enduring sexual violence is a living, changing, growing, interactive person. (1979:38)” In this excerpt, Barry defines victim typifications as problematic, precisely because this identity denies women their agency; they are people lacking “will” and to whom things “are done” (1979:38).” 34 - 35 -====B - Rhetoric of “victim” causes a loss of agency, instructing others to perceive the abused as a helpless, passive, individual. Dunn,==== 36 -Jennifer L. Dunn Professor of Sociology at Southern Illinois University, "“Victims” and “Survivors”: Emerging Vocabularies of Motive for “Battered Women Who Stay”" Sociological Inquiry Vol. 75, Issue 1, p. 1-30(Dec 2004) FD 37 -In sum, the cultural context within which typifications of battered women as “survivors” appear is one characterized by multiple voices problematizing the identity of “victim,” for a variety of reasons. Feminists argue about the political implications of its overpurification and polarity in a binary classification. Therapists want victims to leave behind their victim identities as part of healing from trauma, and shelter workers and battered women present realities far more complex than simplistic imagery can encompass. Importantly, the term “victim” has accrued associations from which even those who are harmed by social problems distance themselves.5 While the reasons for this are complex, they have mostly to do with the lack of agency that appears, in the logic of this process, to define victimization. As Holstein and Miller argue, to “victimize someone instructs others is to understand the person as a rather passive, indeed helpless, recipient of injury or injustice . . . this denies ‘disables’ a person to the extent that victim status appropriates one’s personal identity as a competent efficacious actor (1997:43)”. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-08 05:09:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Nate Woodford - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest DC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - Stop Saying the Word Victim - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ralston
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,46 +1,0 @@ 1 -====I am never running this case again because it is so cringe==== 2 - 3 -====I affirm. I value morality because ought denotes a moral obligation. In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action. Young:==== 4 -Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM 5 -Some feminist and ... affirms group differences. 6 - 7 -====This requires a reconciliation between different groups values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups. Young:==== 8 -Second, because it ... facilitates such expression. 9 - 10 -Multiple impacts: 11 -A. Analytic 12 -B. Analytic 13 -====C. Ensuring that voices are included the political system requires questioning the assumptions behind the stratification of individuals. Winters and Leighton 99:==== 14 -Winter, D. D., and Leighton, D. C. (2001). Structural violence. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, and D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century. New York: Prentice-Hall. CM 15 -Finally, to recognize ... appreciation of diversity. 16 - 17 -====Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.==== 18 - 19 -====We observe that universities are the most important site of first amendment activity. Goodman,==== 20 -S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae. 21 -The University is ... influence and attainment. Id. 22 - 23 -====Contention 1: Cooption==== 24 -====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements. Adler writes that,==== 25 -(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.) 26 -The failure of ... left's very eyes. 27 - 28 -====Contention 2: Education==== 29 -====Prohibitions on certain aspects of speech creates conformist ideology that spills over into creating the mindless student - there is no free-thinking, so there is no way to know why certain speech is harmful. Uelmen,==== 30 -A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Campus Hate Speech Codes Gerald Uelmen https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, 1990 31 -Additionally, critics assert ... a nonegalitarian world. 32 - 33 -====This has two implications==== 34 - 35 -A. Analytic 36 -B. Analytic 37 - 38 -====Contention 3: excitable speech==== 39 -====Arbitrary determinations of what speech is good versus what’s bad locks trauma of the oppression in the words themselves not to the bad people. Butler,==== 40 -Butler, Judith (Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, University of California-Berkeley), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, 1997. 41 -This story underscores ... is partially open. 42 - 43 -====Additionally, censorship is guaranteed to fail – injurious speech just becomes recirculated. Butler further,==== 44 -Neither view can ... precisely a context. 45 - 46 -====Therefore, for the reasons of cooption of student movements through speech regulation, a harm of education, and locking in of trauma by the use of codes, we affirm.= - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-11 23:41:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Daniel Russel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Fremont JV - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - Structural Violence - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southeast
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,23 +1,0 @@ 1 -I am just so annoyed that this happened. I assumed that Valley would be a reasonable team that accepts others, or had some base-line of respect (like not misgendering in the 2AR after having misgendering theory ran against them, perhaps?). I was wrong. Very wrong, I guess. But hey, you got top speaker - the Lauren Burdt award - so it's okay to be blatantly disrespectful and careless in what you're doing, right? Guess so! 2 - 3 -Congratulations, Conal, for winning an award that dealt with someone's commitment to making debate a great space, and then for spitting in the face of it. 4 - 5 -Onto the actual argument that I read... 6 - 7 -====Interp: Debaters should not misgender opponents; if pronouns are unknown, default to 'they'.==== 8 - 9 -====Violation: they were p misgendering in their speech. Also, lol, my pronouns are both on the wiki and on your text updates for rounds, so no excuse.==== 10 - 11 -====3 reasons to prefer theory:==== 12 - 13 -====1. Misgendering results in personal safety being threatened. Finch 14==== 14 -Finch 14‘ Sam Dylan Finch, a transgender writer and unapologetic feminist, “What Your Really Saying When you Ignore Someone’s Pronouns”, Lets Queer Things Up, Queer Feminist Politics, 9/15/14, https://letsqueerthingsup.com/2014/09/15/what-youre-actually-saying-when-you-ignore-someones-preferred-gender-pronouns/ LMcF 15 -It can’t be ... a beautiful thing. 16 - 17 -====2. Misgendering perpetuates structural violence. King 2016==== 18 -King 2016 (Jessica, York University, Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Graduate: Aisthesis Volume 7, 2016 “The Violence of Heteronormative Language Towards the Queer Community”) 19 -Misgendering transgender people ... are not women." 20 - 21 -====3. Judge as adjudicator requires shaping debaters for the future- drop the debater for their discourse to let them know that what they did is wrong to form them into better people for tomorrow. There is no incentive with just ignoring the harms they presented- see two impacts above of why this is harmful in debate.=== 22 - 23 -====And, theory is apriori, meaning if I win the theory flow, you auto-affirm. If I lose the theory, auto-negate (hint: I won't), because substance is no longer important - safety is p important, and.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 04:21:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Richard Shmikler - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -West Des Moines Valley Conal Thomas-McGinnis - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - be respectful - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Millard North
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -This argument relies heavily on a narrative framework that I'm not particularly comfortable disclosing. I think that it destroys the purpose of a narrative or a lived experience to have it 'prepped out'... 2 - 3 -If you'd like me to disclose, add me on Facebook at Lexus Root (not just message me, otherwise I won't see the message). Can't promise anything, but it can't hurt to ask. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-06 16:22:58.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East FC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -03 - IPV - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Natquals Ralston
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10,11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aff was Crip v2 neg was hate speech I did some O'Brien in AR - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-29 16:11:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northeast - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC was robots NC was intersectionality - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northstar
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-08 05:09:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Nate Woodford - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest DC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -I found this round to be one of the most disappointing ones I have ever been a part of 2 -Danny decided to argue that because I critique his specific language that it is justified to say that I don't care about sexual assault survivors and that I am propogating sexual assault rape myths 3 -This is utterly ridiculous 4 -He is also deciding to refuse to change his language because he doesn't personally see a problem with it - and he says the same thing about frat boys - they don't see a problem with their language and so they decide to not change it 5 -Also he lost on this theory - exactly the same - before 6 -Utterly ridiculous and one of the worst rounds I have ever been a part of - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ralston
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-11 23:41:50.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Daniel Russel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Fremont JV - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Uhhhhh so I didn't actually run this aff this round I was neg lol but I forgot to disclose this from a previous tournament so I am doing it here - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southeast
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 04:21:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Richard Shmikler - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -West Des Moines Valley Conal Thomas-McGinnis - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -sigh - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Millard North
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -16 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-06 16:22:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East FC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC was IPV neg was something idk - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Natquals Ralston
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-07 23:18:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +mation - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Infor - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Informational pane - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln Southwest