Changes for page Lincoln NE Root Aff
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 0 added, 4 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-08 17:03:03. 01 +2017-01-08 17:03:03.634
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -(This is all of the new evidence) 2 - 3 -====We do this: Crip spaces. What that means, we let Chandler explain,==== 4 -Eliza Chandler, http://nomorepotlucks.org/site/cripping-community-new-meanings-of-disability-and-community/, Cripping Community: 5 -New Meanings of Disability and Community, No More Potlucks, doctorial fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and is a Senior Doctorial Fellow at New College, U of T. She teaches courses in Disability Studies at New College and at OISE/UT 6 -Ableism, to be ... be in community. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - Cripistemologies v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -====The issues that the negative point out are not even constitutionally protected speech on the site of the campus - in general, as their evidence suggests, it is constitutionally protected, but in university is not. We apply the O’Brien test, as explained by the Supreme Court in United States v. O’Brien,==== 2 -Supreme Court, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 27 May 1968, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/obrien.html, as a note: the O’Brien case was specific to draft resistance, but the O’Brien test is still in effect 3 -We cannot accept ... for violating it. 4 - 5 -Perm: do both; not mutually exclusive with the affirmative and thus no competition. If they say they have no counterplan and so it can’t be permed, vote them down because they have become a moving target in the debate - that’s a voter for education and fairness because we no longer have a meaningful debate when they change the topic at any point. 6 - 7 -Analytics 8 - 9 -Analytics 10 - 11 -Analytics 12 - 13 -Perm solves, extend their evidence. 14 - 15 -Analytics - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -02 - OBrien - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10,11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 22:14:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest RJ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Aff was Crip v2 neg was hate speech I did some O'Brien in AR - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln East
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-29 16:11:38.188 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XX - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northeast - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC was robots NC was intersectionality - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Northstar