| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====The issues that the negative point out are not even constitutionally protected speech on the site of the campus - in general, as their evidence suggests, it is constitutionally protected, but in university is not. We apply the O’Brien test, as explained by the Supreme Court in United States v. O’Brien,==== |
| 2 |
|
-Supreme Court, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 27 May 1968, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/obrien.html, as a note: the O’Brien case was specific to draft resistance, but the O’Brien test is still in effect |
| 3 |
|
-We cannot accept ... for violating it. |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-Analytics |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-Analytics |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Analytics |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-Perm solves, extend their evidence. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Analytics |