Changes for page Lincoln NE Root Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-08 17:01:19. 91 +2017-01-08 17:01:19.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +====Under the current system of the university and speech codes, those with dis/abilities are often excluded de facto to a level that is nearly de jure in nature - those who do not have social understandings to the level of the average person are structurally excluded from discussions regarding what speech is protected and what speech is not. Dr Drake explains one of many dis/abilities that are structurally harmed from speech codes,==== 2 +Dr. Miles E. Drake Jr., MD, Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder DSM-5 315.39 (F80.89), no date, theravive, http://www.theravive.com/therapedia/Social-(Pragmatic)-Communication-Disorder-DSM~-~-5-315.39-(F80.89) 3 +Social (pragmatic) communication ... cases of SCD. 4 + 5 +====Internalized ableism is perpetuated through the ruse of an objective academic speech code, whereby passing is used by academics to hide their impairments so that they aren’t seen as needy or troublemakers. Absent the affirmative method, the violence of internalized ableism continues. Professor Campbell of Griffith writes,==== 6 +Fiona Kumari Campbell, Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory, 2008, ellipses in original 7 +In the case ... and networking arrangements (see Bishop 1999; Monaghan, 1998). 8 + 9 +====Standard: deconstruct ableism==== 10 + 11 +====And, instead of a feigned redress for the harms presented to people with dis/abilities, we offer an affirmation of individuals that ableism, typical “reasonable accommodations” rhetoric, and neoliberal inclusivity leaves behind. The method is a cripistemological affirmation of the failure of the normalizing process that seeks to destroy difference, and opens up a meaningful dialogue regarding the exclusive inclusive nature of the university. Mitchell et al write,==== 12 +Every Child Left Behind” Curricular Cripistemologies and the Crip/Queer Art of Failure, David T. Mitchell, Sharon L. Snyder, and Linda Ware, The George Washington University / Independent Scholar / SUNY–Geneseo, 2014 13 +Most indicators point ... neoliberal tolerance allows. 14 + 15 +====Only starting from a cripistemologogical standpoint can challenge the underlying logics that support compulsory-ableism. Mitchell et al further,==== 16 +As a corrective ... dictates of standardization. 17 + 18 +====Cripistemologies are not only for crip people – the structural exclusion of people with dis/abilities concerns us all. Johnson and McRuer write,==== 19 +Merri Lisa Johnson, University of South Carolina Upstate; Robert McRuer, George Washington University. “Cripistemologies: Introduction” Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies Volume 8, Issue 2, 2014 20 +Cripistemology, as we ... require of us. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-08 17:01:20.58 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +J Slechta - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Millard North MM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln NE Root Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +02 - Cripistemologies - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westside