| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,27 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Kafka 36==== |
|
2 |
+Franz Kafka, ungeheures Ungeziefer, 1936, Gibs Auf!, Beschreibung eines Kampfes, trans. 1958 in Description of a Struggle |
|
3 |
+It was very ... with their laughter. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+====How do we evaluate the debate round? We evaluate as we always have, by plugging yourself into the methodology of the affirmative and asking if the affirmative works for you, and if not, plugging in the negative and asking if that works for you. Deleuze 95==== |
|
6 |
+Gilles Deleuze, Negotiations, published in 1995, Columbia University Press, p.8-9 |
|
7 |
+There are, you ... reading with love. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Kafka, in a letter to Oskar Pollak writes,==== |
|
10 |
+Franz Kafka, January 27 1904, in a letter to Oskar Pollak, republished in 2004, http://languagehat.com/kafka-on-books/ |
|
11 |
+Altogether, I think ... what I believe. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====Kafka 25==== |
|
14 |
+Franz Kafka, ungeheures Ungeziefer, published in 1925, trans. Ian Johnston, no date of publication, Franz Kafka Online, http://www.kafka-online.info/before-the-law.html |
|
15 |
+Before the law ... to close it. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====What does this mean in relation to the topic? What does it mean in relation to our lives? Glen ‘07==== |
|
18 |
+Patrick J. Glen, published in 2007, published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Volume 17:23 2007, “The Deconstruction and Reification of Law in Franz Kafka’s “Before the Law” and The Trial”, pages 42-43 accessed 11/2/16, http://clhc.usc.edu/why/students/orgs/ilj/assets/docs/17-120Glen.pdf |
|
19 |
+The difference lies ... London in 1982.163 |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====The Law is omnipresent, collected by lines from individual to individual, capable of radically being experimented upon. This experimentation of the Law allows for us to criticise the interactions between individuals that leads to interactions of hate; this transformation (perhaps even a Metamorphosis) of the Law allows us to individually change our relation to others to productively engage. We aren’t policymakers, we are people who have wishes and dreams and wants and fears and secrets and people around us, and you can only affect the world as far as you can investigate those wishes and dreams and wants and fears and secrets and people around you.==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+====And so the only alternative is to investigate the Law as you personally are able to- everyday, quotidian, individual interactions of the law to be further looked upon and understood. Situate yourself among the Law; how do you personally engage with it? Study desiring as the Law; study yourself. Deleuze and Guattari write in 1986==== |
|
24 |
+Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, 1986, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature, Immanence and Desire, p43-52 |
|
25 |
+From this point ... throws at him. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+====Plug the affirmative into yourself and see what it has to offer.==== |