| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,52 @@ |
|
1 |
+This debate, today, will be revolving around Islamophobia. Mass media today greatly exaggerates the “terrorist” threat and assign this label to muslim bodies. Many muslims are wrongly persecuted and attacked on a day to day biases. It is therefore crucial for our policy, in this round, to revolve around islamophobic oppression in regards to police and their usage of qualified immunity. Thus, the standard in this debate is to find the best strategy to resist Islamophobic oppression. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+McQueeny 14, {McQueeney, K. (2014). Disrupting Islamophobia: Teaching the Social Construction of Terrorism in the Mass Media.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(2), 297-298} |
|
4 |
+Today, the mass media plays ... but remained substantial at 35 (Gallup, 2013). |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Contention one: Inherency |
|
7 |
+Cooper was a man who was accused of rape, this was due to the fact that Dupnik found a biomedical print similar to Cooper. Thereafter Cooper was detained by the police for hours, wherein the police stated his miranda rights and he asked to counsel with a lawyer. Nonetheless the police kept him in an interrogation facility and continued to question him. Trying to get him to confess to something that he didn’t do. It is important to note that they found that the print match-up was incorrect, but proceeded to keep him in detention. After they finally let him free, Cooper had lost his job and housing due to this incident. He sued. In Cooper v Dupnik, the Ninth Circuit Courts allowed Qualified Immunity in cases where the police have harmfully interrogated individuals, ignoring whether or not they had actual innocence. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Legale 1989 {http://www.leagle.com/decision/19912444924F2d1520_12208/COOPER20v.20DUPNIK } |
|
10 |
+We reverse the district court's ... and is not, the law. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Cooper V Dupnik had very harmful effects on the muslim community. Here’s some stats from just one program that uses interrogation methods- this shows that police interrogations have significantly affected muslim bodies. |
|
14 |
+TLC11 {Civilandhumansrightscoalition, http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/racial-profiling2011/the-reality-of-racial.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/ } |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+Another example of ... contentious presidential election.50 |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Contention 2: Harms |
|
21 |
+The court's ruling on Cooper V Dupnik enabled the police to maliciously interrogate people without any clarification to what ends interrogation must be met within, therefore opening up space for mass wrongful Muslim interrogation, especially in period of the War on Terror. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Yin 10 {Tung , Professor of Law in criminal justice, “I DO NOT THINK IMPLAUSIBLE MEANS WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS”: IQBAL V. ASHCROFT AND JUDICIAL VOUCHING FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS , pg 215} |
|
24 |
+What Cooper and the... interrogation or other purposes. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+It’s clear that when the police interrogate innocent Muslims, the wrongful interrogations are just done in order to inflict racialized revenge upon these civilians. The civilians should be able to get reparations and abolishing qi for malicious interrogations will hold the police accountable and deter wrongful interrogations. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Costanzo 09 {Mark A. , Professor of Pyschology at the Claremont Mckenna College, The Effects and Effectiveness of Using Torture as an Interrogation Device: Using Research to Inform the Policy Debate |
|
32 |
+, pg 202 ) |
|
33 |
+Although torture does not...basic desire for revenge. |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+Thus the Plan: The United States should limit qualified immunity by holding police liable if they used methods which “shock the conscience” in police interrogations. This means~-~- |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+Hawkins 93 {Julie E. , Lawyer, Cooper V. Dupnik: Civil Liability For Unconstitutional Interrogations, |
|
41 |
+pg 1222-1223} |
|
42 |
+The shock-the-conscience standard ... their behavior in line.?5 |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+Contention 3: Solvency |
|
48 |
+The plan is key- civil suits hold the police accountable and prevent further action and the “shock-the-conscience” clause focuses upon the action of the police and their wrongfulness. Additionally since the survivors of the interrogations are able to hold police accountable they will be able to get funds to remedy the violence and get the emotional closure by the acknowledgement of the wrongful act. |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+Hawkins 93 {Julie E. , Lawyer, Cooper V. Dupnik: Civil Liability For Unconstitutional Interrogations, |
|
51 |
+pg 1226} |
|
52 |
+If courts allow section ... efforts to solve crimes. 26 |