Changes for page Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 4 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact: jss229438@gmail.com 2 - 3 -Pronouns: they/her - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-06 15:43:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Colten White - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Norfolk BN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -00 - Information - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,63 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Definitions== 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 -Value: Government Legitimacy, as achieved when the government protects the rights of citizens. 7 -Criterion: Increasing Accountability 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 -==Contention One: Qualified Immunity is excused ignorance for public officials. == 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 -Armacost 98 { Barbara, Professor of Law at University of Virginia Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused, http://www.law.virginia.edu/pdf/faculty/hein/armacost/51vand_l_rev583_1998.pdf, pg 2} 18 -In this Article, Professor Armacost uses fair notice in criminal law as a paradigm for analyzing the role of not 19 -...AND... 20 - attach. In such cases, qualified immunity's notice inquiry-whether the law was clear-acts as a proxy for fault. 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 -==Contention Two: Qualified Immunity has been an ignorant excuse in many instances, and we can see this in the case of Leija and Sheenah. == 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 -A) QI was claimed wrongly in the case of Mullenix V Leijha. 31 - Liptak 15 { Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. 32 -...AND... 33 -/www.nytimes.com/2015/11/10/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-police-officer-who-shot-man-in-car-chase.html } 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 -====B ) The supreme court ruled in favor of the policemen who shoot Teresea Sheehan, a woman with (dis)abilities. ==== 39 -Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } 40 -The court sided with two San Francisco police officers who in 2008 shot Teresa Sheehan, a mentally ill woman, wh 41 -...AND... 42 -San Francisco’s shift in its legal position as the case proceeded had made it impossible to address the question. 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 -==Contention 3: Reduction of Qualified Immunity will allow for further elaboration of constitutional rights and clearly establish more laws. == 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 -====Overall the defense of qualified immunity freezes constitutional elaboration==== 53 -Matz et al 2011 {Joshua Matz graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 2012. He was a law clerk to Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York., “Avoiding Permanent Limbo: Qualified Immunity and the Elaboration of Constitutional Rights from 54 -Saucier to Camreta (and Beyond)” Pg 672-673} 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 -====AND By reducing qualified immunity, we see an increase of constitutional elaboration. ==== 60 -Beermann 2009 {Jack Michael , Professor of law at boston university,QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL AVOIDANCE, Pg 34} 61 -The Supreme Court’s elimination of the subjective element of the qualified immunity defense in constitutional to 62 -...AND... 63 -no longer required to reach the constitutional merits whenever the defendant raises a qualified immunity defense. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-06 15:43:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Colten White - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Norfolk BN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -01 - Governmental legitimacy affirmative - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0,1 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-06 15:43:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Colten White - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Norfolk BN - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Information Affirmative used for all tournament - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lincoln Southwest
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-26 00:17:12. 6391 +2016-11-26 00:17:12.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,6 @@ 1 +Contact: jss229438@gmail.com 2 + 3 +Pronouns: they/her 4 + 5 +Please do not spread when you go against me. I find it funny how people always ask the judge if speed was okay, and totally neglect the other team. Spreading is not okay because it totally excludes people with (dis)abilites, even though I don't have any (dis)abilites that does not allow me to process information at incredibly quick paces, I do not understand anything when people spread and freak out during the rounds, which just results in a shit debate. I love debate because I view debators from other teams as my friends. I don't place lots of emphasis on the ballot rather on my bonds that I make with my fellow LD debators so I do try to make my rounds as inclusive as possible and I wish for you to do the same for other debators. 6 +~Jesse - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-05 15:23:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colten White - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Norfolk BN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +00 - Information - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln Southwest
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,63 @@ 1 +==Definitions== 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 +Value: Government Legitimacy, as achieved when the government protects the rights of citizens. 7 +Criterion: Increasing Accountability 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 +==Contention One: Qualified Immunity is excused ignorance for public officials. == 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 +Armacost 98 { Barbara, Professor of Law at University of Virginia Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused, http://www.law.virginia.edu/pdf/faculty/hein/armacost/51vand_l_rev583_1998.pdf, pg 2} 18 +In this Article, Professor Armacost uses fair notice in criminal law as a paradigm for analyzing the role of not 19 +...AND... 20 + attach. In such cases, qualified immunity's notice inquiry-whether the law was clear-acts as a proxy for fault. 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 +==Contention Two: Qualified Immunity has been an ignorant excuse in many instances, and we can see this in the case of Leija and Sheenah. == 26 + 27 + 28 + 29 + 30 +A) QI was claimed wrongly in the case of Mullenix V Leijha. 31 + Liptak 15 { Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. 32 +...AND... 33 +/www.nytimes.com/2015/11/10/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-police-officer-who-shot-man-in-car-chase.html } 34 + 35 + 36 + 37 + 38 +====B ) The supreme court ruled in favor of the policemen who shoot Teresea Sheehan, a woman with (dis)abilities. ==== 39 +Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } 40 +The court sided with two San Francisco police officers who in 2008 shot Teresa Sheehan, a mentally ill woman, wh 41 +...AND... 42 +San Francisco’s shift in its legal position as the case proceeded had made it impossible to address the question. 43 + 44 + 45 + 46 + 47 +==Contention 3: Reduction of Qualified Immunity will allow for further elaboration of constitutional rights and clearly establish more laws. == 48 + 49 + 50 + 51 + 52 +====Overall the defense of qualified immunity freezes constitutional elaboration==== 53 +Matz et al 2011 {Joshua Matz graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 2012. He was a law clerk to Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York., “Avoiding Permanent Limbo: Qualified Immunity and the Elaboration of Constitutional Rights from 54 +Saucier to Camreta (and Beyond)” Pg 672-673} 55 + 56 + 57 + 58 + 59 +====AND By reducing qualified immunity, we see an increase of constitutional elaboration. ==== 60 +Beermann 2009 {Jack Michael , Professor of law at boston university,QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL AVOIDANCE, Pg 34} 61 +The Supreme Court’s elimination of the subjective element of the qualified immunity defense in constitutional to 62 +...AND... 63 +no longer required to reach the constitutional merits whenever the defendant raises a qualified immunity defense. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-05 15:23:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colten White - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Norfolk BN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +01 - Governmental legitimacy affirmative - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln Southwest
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,36 @@ 1 +The standard today will be resisting able-normativity. We do this providing eachother with education that opposes mainstream able-normativity. Therefore the debate will be about whoever gives the best methodology for resisting ableist oppression. 2 +HARRIS 85 {Merrill, Feminist Teacher, Making Our Students Aware of Ableism pp. 8-10 } 3 +We can begin to ...perpetuate this oppression. 4 + 5 + 6 +Contention 1: Sheehan and Duffie 7 +The supreme court ruled in favor of granting the police qualified immunity, who shot Teresa Sheenah, a japanese women with (dis)abilites. The courts left the question whether ADA applied to police arresting people with (dis)abilites, unquestioned and that opens up for mass police brutality upon people with (dis)abilites and letting the police get away with it by simply claiming Qualified Immunity. 8 +Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } 9 +The court sided with two ... address the question. 10 + 11 + 12 +Mr.s Davis is a women with mental (dis)abilites, she was driving with a suspended license due to lack of insurance. And the police analysed her license place (with the handicapped sigma right next to it) and found her status of the license. They wrongly used excessive force to pull her over, literally dragging her body out of her car and causing her to have a panic attack. Even though the 10 circuit courts, affirmed Davis claims they allowed some of the officers qualified immunity still. IF ADA were applied to this, then the police could have accommodated her arrests and would have prevented the bodily harms inflicted on Mrs. Davis. 13 +United States court of appeals, 10 circuit 2016 14 +On review of summary judgment... transferred to jail 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 + 21 +We affirm and our advocacy is that The Supreme Court of the United States should limit qualified immunity by adopting the Ninth Circuit's decision on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act's applicability to arrest situations in Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco as a legal precedent for all circuits on the next available test case. 22 +This basically means that police have to provide accomodations when arresting people with (dis)abilities. Like Crisis teams in the case of Sheehan. And if the police fail to do so then when they are sued for damages under ADA then any police claims for QI will be dropped. 23 + 24 + 25 +Contention 2: Solvency 26 + 27 +This is key to solve. 28 +Auner 16 {Thomas J. "For the Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable, the ADA Should Apply to Arrests." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 49.1 (2016): 335.} 29 +Excessive force claims stemming ... for the mentally ill. 30 + 31 + 32 +The plan will not only hold police accountable, but will also change police culture. It enables for the survivors with (dis)abilites to have a voice and draws a public outcry. 33 +Armacost 98 {Barbara Armacost, Vanderbilt Law Review, April, 1998, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=90852, "Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused," g-lang edited} 34 + 35 + 36 +If constitutional rights ... of clear constitutional impropriety. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-05 15:28:12.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Segriest - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +West Des Moines Valley - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lincoln NE Nguyen Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +01 ADA case - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Millard West
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-05 15:28:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Segriest - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +West Des Moines Valley - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ADA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Millard West