Changes for page Lexington Venkatasami Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
edited by Vasanth Venkatasami
on 2016/12/17 03:31
on 2016/12/17 03:31
edited by Vasanth Venkatasami
on 2016/12/17 03:31
on 2016/12/17 03:31
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[22]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 03:31:26. 6701 +2016-12-17 03:31:26.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[26]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation—If the affirmative defends that public colleges and universities in the US ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech, they must explicitly specify which types of speech are constitutionally protected in the 1AC 2 + 3 +A. Interp: Debaters may not read a standard of insert standard text, to clarify debaters must not read a standard exclusively concerned with status quo legislation. 4 + 5 +A.On the 2016/2017 NSDA January/ February topic, the affirmative must defend implementation of unrestricting constitutional freedom of speech as a post fiat policy by colleges/Universities with a delinated plan text in the 1AC - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-17 03:31:28.265 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +22 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lexington Venkatasami Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- Blake Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Blake