Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,43 +1,0 @@
1		-Construction of nuclear extinction is designed to create fear, the kind of fear that justifies extreme policy action. This is the logic of security.
2		-Jackson 4
3		-(Richard, Lecturer in International Security at the Centre for International Politics at the University of Manchester “The Politics of Threat and Danger: Writing the War on Terrorism*” Paper Presented at the British International Studies Association (BISA) 29th Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 20-22 December, 2004, http://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2160/1947/1/BISA-2004-Paper.pdf)¶ NN
4		-The initial construction of the terrorist threat involved fixing the attacks of September 11,
5		-AND
6		-any ‗rational person‘ should fear a terrorist-induced nuclear holocaust.
7		-
8		-Security discourse creates threats that are not real or objective through false representations. That creates exclusionary violence and war that they try to prevent., this turns case.
9		-GRONDIN 04
10		-David, Masters in Political Science and Ph.D. Candidate – University of Ottawa, “(Re)Writing the ‘National Security State,’ Center for United States Studies
11		-Approaches that deconstruct theoretical practices in order to disclose what is hidden in the use
12		-AND
13		-articulating danger through foreign policy that the state’s very conditions of existence are generated18
14		-
15		-The alternative is to reject the affirmative’s security logic, allowing for real political thought. Only by accepting insecurity as inevitable can we reject the discourse and move beyond security politics. It’s a question of detaching from the value that we attach to it, that’s the source of its power.
16		-NEOCLEOUS 08
17		-Mark Neocleous, 08, “Critique of Security”, Brunel University in the Department of Government
18		-The only way out of such a dilemma, to escape the fetish, is
19		-AND
20		-; it requires us to be brave enough to return the gift.“’
21		-
22		-Discussions of representations are a prerequisite to argumentation.
23		-CRAWFORD 02
24		-Neta, PhD MA MIT, BA Brown, Prof. of poli sci at Boston University, “Argument and Change in World Politics”, p. 19-21
25		-Coherent arguments are unlikely to take place unless and until actors, at least on
26		-AND
27		-ballot can have a real impact on how we think about the world.
28		-
29		-ROB
30		-
31		-The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater whose advocacy best breaks down the securitization of policy.
32		-Burke 2
33		-Anthony Burke Australian political theorist and international relations scholar. He is Associate Professor (Reader) of Politics and International Relations in the University of New South Wales, “Aporias of Security”, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2002,
34		-It is perhaps easy to become despondent, but as countless struggles for freedom,
35		-AND
36		-world after security, and what its shimmering possi- bilities might be.
37		-
38		-Security studies comes prior to our understanding of the world – it’s necessary to frame our discussions
39		-De Larrinaga 9
40		-(Miguel de Larrinaga holds a PhD from the University of Ottawa. He is currently Assistant Professor at the University of Ottawa, Securing Outer Space, ed. Bormann and Sheehan, p. 132-134)
41		-Within the context of security studies, and informed by the above, this approach
42		-AND
43		-II, and monopolized the political imagination for most of the Cold War.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-25 19:44:53.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Mark Ahlstrom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-West Des Moines Valley BK

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-7

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lexington Venkatasami Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT- Extinction Security K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Mid America Cup