Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[30]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[30]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-28 15:01:29.414
	1	+2017-01-28 15:01:29.0

Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,40 @@
	1	+The United States federal government should allow the United States to enter into full compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including Article 20.
	2	+
	3	+AND
	4	+
	5	+Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except for hate speech, defined according to Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
	6	+
	7	+The counterplan creates a precise test for balancing free speech with human dignity—this is key to ensuring equality—reject the aff’s free speech absolutism
	8	+Catlin 14
	9	+Scott Catlin (J.D. cum laude at Notre Dame Law School). “Proposal for Regulating Hate Speech in the United States: Balancing Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 69, issue 4. March 2014. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1971andcontext=ndlr
	10	+The United States has demonstrated that it too holds international human rights standards to be
	11	+AND
	12	+individual freedom” looks different from the viewpoint of historically vilified groups.’
	13	+
	14	+The counterplan reverses the US’s Article 20 reservation—that reservation enables us to ignore the ICCPR’s prohibition on hate speech—the counterplan is key to full compliance which solves American hypocrisy and restores human rights leadership
	15	+Catlin 14
	16	+Scott Catlin (J.D. cum laude at Notre Dame Law School). “Proposal for Regulating Hate Speech in the United States: Balancing Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 69, issue 4. March 2014. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1971andcontext=ndlr
	17	+C. United States Obligations Under the ICCPR Generally, when the United States ratifies
	18	+AND
	19	+and it can learn something from the rest of the world. 8 '
	20	+
	21	+US human rights cred is key to soft power and global human rights protections
	22	+Koh 9
	23	+Harold Hongju Koh (Dean and Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale Law School). “Speech: Repairing Our Human Rights Reputation.” Western New England Law Review. Originally delivered at the Western New England College School of Law on Sept. 9, 2008. Lexis Nexis.
	24	+Since all of us have been alive, our country, the United States,
	25	+AND
	26	+dependence on a commodity that strengthens petro-dictators and weakens democracy worldwide.
	27	+
	28	+Soft power solves multiple scenarios for extinction
	29	+Hamre 7
	30	+John Hamre (specialist in international studies, a former Washington government official and President and CEO of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a position he has held with that think tank since January, 2000). “Restoring America’s Inspirational Leadership.” Forward, CSIS Commission on Smart Power, co-chairs Richard Armitage and Joseph Nye, Jr. 2007. http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/071106_csissmartpowerreport.pdf
	31	+There is a moment of opportunity today for our political leaders to strike off on
	32	+AND
	33	+and practical vision. I am sure they will not be the last.
	34	+
	35	+Independently, credible US commitment to I-Law preserves global follow-on—that solves multiple scenarios for extinction
	36	+IEER 2
	37	+Institute for Energy and Environmental Research and the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy. Rule of Power or Rule of Law? An Assessment of U.S. Policies and Actions Regarding Security-Related Treaties. May 2002. http://www.ieer.org/reports/treaties/execsumm.pdf
	38	+The evolution of international law since World War II is largely a response to the
	39	+AND
	40	+has followed the U.S. example and opted out of compliance.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-28 15:01:31.5

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jacob Nails

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harrison RP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+30

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lexington Venkatasami Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB- ILaw Hate Speech CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Emory