| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,128 @@ |
|
1 |
+Iran Full Ban 1AC |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Framing |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Non ideal theory good |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+Mills 05 |
|
8 |
+Charles W. Mills, “Ideal Theory” as Ideology, 2005 |
|
9 |
+I suggest that this spontaneous reaction, far from being philosophically naïve or jejune |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+that the ideal-as-idealized-model will never be achieved. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Pain provides an objective for why oppression is bad. Thus the standard is maximizing expected well-being. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Gray 09 |
|
16 |
+Gray, James W. "An Argument for Moral Realism." Ethical Realism. N.p., 07 Oct. 2009. Web. 04 Sept. 2015. https://ethicalrealism.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/an-argument-for-moral-realism/. MA in philosophy from San Jose State University (2008) |
|
17 |
+If we have evidence that anything in particular has intrinsic value, then we also |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+attempt to show that the alternatives are less justified in the next section. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Extinction scenarios are key to genuine resistance to power- the state is inevitable but images of apocalypse are a useful tool for resisting dominant power structures. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Schatz 12 |
|
24 |
+JL, Binghamton U, "The Importance of Apocalypse: The Value of End-‐Of-‐ The-‐World Politics While Advancing Ecocriticism," The Journal of Ecocriticism: Vol 4, No 2 (2012) KB |
|
25 |
+Any hesitancy to deploy images of apocalypse out of the risk of acting in a |
|
26 |
+AND |
|
27 |
+where multitudes, and not governments, guide the fate of the planet. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+Humanity has a right to exist— anything else excludes infinite future generations which outweighs their impacts on scope- the 1AC’s discussion is uniquely important |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Cerutti 14 |
|
32 |
+Furio, Professor of Political Philosophy emeritus at the University of Florence and Adjunct Professor at the Scuola superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa. In the last fifteen years, Cerutti has been aVisiting Professor at Harvard, the Universit´e de Paris 8, the Humboldt Universit ¨at zu Berlin, the London School of Economics and Political Science,(China Foreign Affairs University), Beijing, and Stanford University in Florence. Beyond the publications quoted in this article, Cerutti has written widely on the political identity of the Europeans and the legitimacy of the European Union (last publication: Debating Political Identity and Legitimacy in the European Union, ed. with S. Lucarelli and V. Schmidt, Routledge: London 2011), “Humankind’s First Fundamental Right: Survival,” Constellations, 2014 |
|
33 |
+I have explained elsewhere9 why survival rather than justice is the leading category of a |
|
34 |
+AND |
|
35 |
+everybody, not just to the practitioners of academic philosophy Schulphilosophie. |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+Plan |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+Plan Text: Resolved- The federal government of the Islamic Republic of Iran ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+That causes shift to renewables and solves regional stability—current nuclear program is comparatively worse than alternatives. |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+Lovins 15 (#1) |
|
44 |
+Amory B. Lovins- an American physicist, environmental scientist, writer, and Chairman/Chief Scientist of the Rocky Mountain Institute. He has worked in the field of energy policy and related areas for four decades. 27 August 2015, updated 29 September 2015. Iran’s Invisible Opportunity for Energy and Security: Modern energy investments could sideline nuclear ambiguity. RW. |
|
45 |
+The tense standoff and emerging potential shift in America’s vexed relationship with Iran creates a |
|
46 |
+AND |
|
47 |
+To explore this thesis, we need to start with a little history. |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+The current nuclear program is weak and unreliable. |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+Lovins 15 (#2) |
|
52 |
+Amory B. Lovins- an American physicist, environmental scientist, writer, and Chairman/Chief Scientist of the Rocky Mountain Institute. He has worked in the field of energy policy and related areas for four decades. 27 August 2015, updated 29 September 2015. Iran’s Invisible Opportunity for Energy and Security: Modern energy investments could sideline nuclear ambiguity. RW. |
|
53 |
+Amory B. Lovins- an American physicist, environmental scientist, writer, and Chairman/Chief Scientist of the Rocky Mountain Institute. He has worked in the field of energy policy and related areas for four decades. 27 August 2015, updated 29 September 2015. Iran’s Invisible Opportunity for Energy and Security: Modern energy investments could sideline nuclear ambiguity. VR |
|
54 |
+In striking contrast |
|
55 |
+AND |
|
56 |
+ were cheaply done abroad. |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+Adv 1: Middle East Proliferation |
|
59 |
+ |
|
60 |
+Squo |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+Iran is dangerously close to building a nuclear bomb in the status quo. |
|
63 |
+ |
|
64 |
+Rubin 16 |
|
65 |
+Jennifer Rubin, Writer for Washington Post 7-19-2015, "By 2016, Iran could be back building a nuke," https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/07/19/by-2016-iran-could-be-back-building-a-nuke/?utm_term=.2df33f746c82 |
|
66 |
+To repeat: What was supposed to be a phased withdrawal of the sanctions so |
|
67 |
+AND |
|
68 |
+This is only one reason the deal must be thwarted before it begins. |
|
69 |
+ |
|
70 |
+The plan solves because a complete halt of nuclear power is key to preventing nuclear weapons capability. |
|
71 |
+ |
|
72 |
+Lovins 15 (#3) |
|
73 |
+Amory B. Lovins, 1-17-2010, “Proliferation, oil, and climate: solving for pattern,” FOREIGN POLICY, http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2010-02_ProliferationOilClimatePatternVR |
|
74 |
+We can have proliferation with nuclear power, via either end of any fuel cycle |
|
75 |
+AND |
|
76 |
+nuclear power is both a necessary and a nearly sufficient condition for nonproliferation. |
|
77 |
+ |
|
78 |
+Impacts |
|
79 |
+ |
|
80 |
+The Iranian nuclear program causes Middle East nuke weapon proliferation – regardless of whether the bomb exists. |
|
81 |
+ |
|
82 |
+Maloney 15 (#1) |
|
83 |
+Suzanne Maloney, 8-5-2015, "U.S. policy toward the Middle East after the Iranian nuclear agreement," Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/u-s-policy-toward-the-middle-east-after-the-iranian-nuclear-agreement/VR |
|
84 |
+That said, the Saudis may react in other ways. First, we should |
|
85 |
+AND |
|
86 |
+if they do not force Iran to live up to its new commitment. |
|
87 |
+ |
|
88 |
+Iranian breakout capability leads to Middle East instability and war. |
|
89 |
+ |
|
90 |
+Maloney 15 (#2) |
|
91 |
+Suzanne Maloney, 8-5-2015, "U.S. policy toward the Middle East after the Iranian nuclear agreement," Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/u-s-policy-toward-the-middle-east-after-the-iranian-nuclear-agreement/VR |
|
92 |
+Especially in light of these assessments of likely Iranian and Israeli behavior after the nuclear |
|
93 |
+AND |
|
94 |
+pursue policies that could lead to untold and possibly dramatic consequences.”6 |
|
95 |
+ |
|
96 |
+Middle East war goes nuclear. |
|
97 |
+ |
|
98 |
+Goldberg 12 |
|
99 |
+Jeffrey Goldberg, 1-24-2012, "How a Nuclear War Would Start in the Middle East," Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/01/how-a-nuclear-war-would-start-in-the-middle-east/251915/VR |
|
100 |
+But the mullahs are also men interested in keeping hold of temporal power, and |
|
101 |
+AND |
|
102 |
+nuclear weapon could be delivered by sea or land, not by air. |
|
103 |
+ |
|
104 |
+Underview |
|
105 |
+ |
|
106 |
+Neg must defend a competitive post-fiat advocacy. Anything else means they moot the 1AC by up-layering, giving them a 13-7 time advantage that makes it impossible to affirm. My interp also preserves clash by forcing them to answer the aff, which ensures topic education. The resolution is a question of comparative worlds. |
|
107 |
+ |
|
108 |
+NELSON 08 |
|
109 |
+Nelson, Adam F. 2008. Towards A Comprehensive Theory of Lincoln-Douglas Debate. |
|
110 |
+And the truth-statement model of the resolution imposes an absolute burden of proof |
|
111 |
+AND |
|
112 |
+much smaller range of options: advocacy of the resolution as a whole. |
|
113 |
+ |
|
114 |
+OED defines ought as “Used to indicated a desirable of expected state” Textuality is a jurisdictional issue that forms the basis of preround prep and reframes what it means to negate a statement |
|
115 |
+ |
|
116 |
+Aff gets RVIs. Prefer because |
|
117 |
+ |
|
118 |
+A) Time skew – the 2AR doesn’t have enough time to cover both theory and substance since the 2NR is twice as long so I have half the offense at the end of the debate – I should be able to collapse to the highest layer. |
|
119 |
+ |
|
120 |
+B) The 1AR is too short to read theory especially if I have to cover his shell – I need an RVI for theory to be reciprocal, which is key to equal access to the ballot. |
|
121 |
+ |
|
122 |
+The framework and paradigm for the round must conform to the aff. A change after the 1AC results in the neg dodging 6 minutes of offense. This creates a 13-7 difference in argument time and allows the neg to avoid clash with 1AC arguments, thereby harming fairness and education. |
|
123 |
+ |
|
124 |
+Abstract questioning is useless - debate should seek to design concrete alternatives. |
|
125 |
+Bryant 12 (EDITED FOR GENDERED LANGUAGE – the author said “she” and it was replaced with the word “to” – Levi Bryant is currently a Professor of Philosophy at Collin College. In addition to working as a professor, Bryant has also served as a Lacanian psychoanalyst. He received his Ph.D. from Loyola University in Chicago, Illinois, where he originally studied 'disclosedness' with the Heidegger scholar Thomas Sheehan. Bryant later changed his dissertation topic to the transcendental empiricism of Gilles Deleuze, “Critique of the Academic Left”, http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/) |
|
126 |
+I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because |
|
127 |
+AND |
|
128 |
+things contain dirty secrets, ugly motives, and are doomed to fail. |