Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[0]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[0]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-17 17:50:12.382
	1	+2016-09-17 17:50:12.0

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,28 @@
	1	+Their evidence states we should defer to moral consensus before individual opinions. This idea of ethical expertise violates the conditions of equal ethical discourse, as we declare some person’s moral judgments to be more valuable than another’s, prima facie.
	2	+
	3	+Scofield 08 Giles R. Scofield. “Speaking of Ethical Expertise . . .” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 18, Number 4, December 2008, pp. 369-384 (Article) AJ
	4	+
	5	+It is here
	6	+that carries the day.
	7	+
	8	+This model of ethical discourse only re-entrenches oppressive power structures – it also delinks the framework since the moral methodology does not follow from the ideal of non domination.
	9	+
	10	+Scofield 08 Giles R. Scofield. “Speaking of Ethical Expertise . . .” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 18, Number 4, December 2008, pp. 369-384 (Article) AJ
	11	+Not only might
	12	+when this thinking surfaced 20 years ago: “Poppycock!”
	13	+
	14	+The impact is biopolitical oppression legitimized by the force of morality.
	15	+
	16	+Evans 13 Evans, Brad (from, Deleuze and Fascism: Security: War: Aesthetics, 2013
	17	+This brings us
	18	+sediment of political existence.
	19	+
	20	+The alternative is ethical inclusion – we must recognize the deliberative and moral capacities of every human being.
	21	+
	22	+McGrath 11 McGrath, Sarah. "Skepticism about moral expertise as a puzzle for moral realism." Journal of Philosophy 108.3 (2011): 111 AJ
	23	+Consider then an alternative
	24	+reflection and deliberation.
	25	+Fiat is illusory, reps come first as they affect the way we think about the world and shift policy outcomes making the K a prereq to the aff.
	26	+CRAWFORD 2 NETA CRAWFORD, PHD MA MIT, BA BROWN, PROF. OF POLI SCI AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY, “ARGUMENT AND CHANGE IN WORLD POLITICS”, P. 19-21
	27	+Coherent arguments are
	28	+meta-argument

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-17 17:50:13.856

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Terrence Lonam

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood WJ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lexington Balachundhar Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1- Moral Expertise K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill