Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[12]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[12]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,82 +1,0 @@
1		-===Part 1 – Resolutional Burden===
2		-
3		-
4		-====To prohibit is defined by Merriam Webster's as: ====
5		-to make (something) impossible to do
6		-
7		-
8		-====On the other hand, regulations are defined by Collins Dictionary as: ====
9		-regulations or rules that are put in place to ensure a product, event, etc, is safe and not dangerous
10		-
11		-
12		-====Two implications:====
13		-====A. Analytic.====
14		-====B. Analytic. ====
15		-
16		-====To prove that a prohibition rather than a regulation is called for, the AFF must demonstrate the harms are necessarily inseparable from the production of nuclear power, not merely that they are in status quo technology. ====
17		-====Analytic. ====
18		-
19		-
20		-===Part 2 – Offense===
21		-====So, we advocate that countries ought to not prohibit but rather regulate the production of nuclear power so that the only nuclear power that can exist is those that ====
22		-====1. Don't produce radioactive waste that requires long term storage ====
23		-====2. Don't use fissile material that could be hijacked for weaponized purposes ====
24		-====3. Don't harm biodiversity====
25		-====4. Don't have automated systems that immediately shut down the reactor when it malfunctions or overheats ====
26		-====5. Don't have passive cooling====
27		-
28		-
29		-====The first plank solves your terror link since there isn't waste for them to steal. AND a regulation solves best because a prohibition doesn't allow for the reusing of waste.====
30		-**John Upton, ~~journalist~~, "Our Nuclear Waste is a Goldmine," 21 November 2013, http://nautil.us/issue/7/waste/ournuclear-**
31		-**waste-is-a-goldmine**
32		-If America's nuclear waste could be turned
33		-AND
34		-make the new reactors work, new economic policies have to work first.
35		-
36		-
37		-====The second plank solves your terror link because some reactors can't be used to make nuclear weapons.====
38		-**Warmflash 15, M.D. from Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, and has done post-doctoral work at Brandeis University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Johnson Space Center**
39		-**(David, "Thorium Power Is the Safer Future of Nuclear Energy", Discover Magazine, January 16, online: **http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/01/16/thorium-future-nuclear-energy/~~#.V75ycigrLIU**, accessed August 24 – MG)**
40		-But perhaps the most salient benefit of thorium power, in our geopolitically dicey world
41		-AND
42		--232, unless they had a robot to carry out the task.
43		-
44		-
45		-====The third plank solves your biodiversity impact. You have to prove that the production of nuclear power actively threatens biodiversity now. However, your internal link is about construction. So, you only criticize the new construction or reactors, not the production of nuclear power with current reactors. ====
46		-
47		-
48		-====The fourth plank solves your meltdown impacts.====
49		-**Warmflash 15, M.D. from Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, and has done post-doctoral work at Brandeis University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Johnson Space Center**
50		-**(David, "Thorium Power Is the Safer Future of Nuclear Energy", Discover Magazine, January 16, online: **http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/01/16/thorium-future-nuclear-energy/~~#.V75ycigrLIU**, accessed August 24 – MG)**
51		-The isotope of thorium that's being studied for power is called Th-232.
52		-AND
53		-happens the hot liquid would all drain out and the reaction would stop.
54		-
55		-
56		-====Fifth plank solves your natural disaster links====
57		-**Chandler, science writer about energy, engineering, and materials science for the MIT News Office, 2014**
58		-**(David, "Floating nuclear plants could ride out tsunamis", MIT, April 16, Online: **http://news.mit.edu/2014/floating-nuclear-plants-could-ride-out-tsunamis-0416**, Accessed September 16 – MG)**
59		-A floating platform several miles offshore, moored in about 100 meters of water,
60		-AND
61		-passively, with no intervention. The reactor containment itself is essentially underwater."
62		-
63		-
64		-====Sub-Point A) The AFF offense is about harms that are not intrinsic to the production of nuclear power.====
65		-====Analytic.====
66		-
67		-====Solves the AFF.====
68		-====Analytic.====
69		-
70		-====Analytic.====
71		-
72		-====Sub-point B) There is a disadvantage to the AFF solving the problem with the overkill approach of solving a harm by using a prohibition when it could be just as well solved by a regulation. Prohibition kills RandD of potentially versions of nuclear energy that are good under the aff standard:====
73		-====1. Analytic.====
74		-====2. Analytic.====
75		-
76		-
77		-====Analytic implication.====
78		-
79		-
80		-====AND, this operates under any paradigm. ====
81		-====A. Analytic ====
82		-====B. Analytic ====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-15 22:21:32.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-John Sims

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Immaculate Heart DD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-8

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Law Magnet Gao Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT - Regulations Burden Off

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Heart of Texas Invitational