| ... |
... |
@@ -1,21
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-=Regulations NC = |
| 2 |
|
-A. Prohibition vs. Regulation: |
| 3 |
|
-Analytic |
| 4 |
|
-B. Burden: |
| 5 |
|
-In order to prove a prohibition, the aff must show that the harms are inherent to nuclear production because contingent harms are not problems with nuclear power, which is the just the splitting of atoms, but problems the current form of power has, like that it produces waste. |
| 6 |
|
-Analytics |
| 7 |
|
-C. Offense: |
| 8 |
|
-The CP Text is to prohibit all reactors that require uranium. |
| 9 |
|
-This is competitive because you ban all reactors and I maintain the possibility of better technology in the future. Nuclear prohibition kills research and development. |
| 10 |
|
-A. Analytic |
| 11 |
|
-B. Analytic |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====Future tech solves:==== |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====Russia proves reactors don’t need waste.==== |
| 17 |
|
-Templeton, writer living in Vancouver, BC. Graham has a BSc in Molecular Biology and writes for a number of local and online publications, 2014 |
| 18 |
|
-(Graham, "Russia bets its energy future on waste-free fast breeder nuclear reactors", July 10, Online: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/186023-russia-bets-its-energy-future-on-waste-free-fast-breeder-nuclear-reactors Accessed September 9 – MG) |
| 19 |
|
-Russian engineers began a fission reaction at the BN-800 fast breeder nuclear reactor |
| 20 |
|
-AND |
| 21 |
|
-domestically and in the world at large, over the next several years. |