| ... |
... |
@@ -1,43
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==1 – T == |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====Interpretation – the affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech. ==== |
| 5 |
|
-Violation: conceded in cross-ex. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-===="Resolved" means enactment of a law.==== |
| 9 |
|
-**Words and Phrases 64** Words and Phrases Permanent Edition (Multi-volume set of judicial definitions). "Resolved". 1964. |
| 10 |
|
-Definition of the word "resolve," given by Webster is "to express an |
| 11 |
|
-AND |
| 12 |
|
-, it is prohibited by statute from exercising direct control over othereducational institutions. |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====Law Dictionary defines protected speech==== |
| 15 |
|
-West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Freedom of Speech”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. MX. |
| 16 |
|
-The right, guaranteed by the First Amendment |
| 17 |
|
-AND |
| 18 |
|
-Framers clearly had not contemplated. |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-====Law Dictionary defines public colleges and universities==== |
| 21 |
|
-West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Colleges and Universities”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. |
| 22 |
|
-The term college is a |
| 23 |
|
-AND |
| 24 |
|
-control over other educational institutions. |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
- |
| 27 |
|
-====Negate:==== |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-====1:==== |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-====2:==== |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
-====3:==== |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-====4:==== |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-====5:==== |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-====6. Institutional engagement: the state is inevitable—learning to speak the language of power creates the only possibility of social change debate can offer. This is best served by imagining the consequences of policy.==== |
| 40 |
|
-**Coverstone 05** Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) "Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact" Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17^^th^^ 2005 JW 11/18/15 |
| 41 |
|
-An important concern emerges when Mitchell describes reflexive fiat as a contest strategy capable of |
| 42 |
|
-AND |
| 43 |
|
-that is a fundamental cause of voter and participatory abstention in America today. |