Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[31]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[27]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[31]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,100 +1,0 @@
1		-==2NR OV==
2		-The framework establishes the standard of interrogating how whiteness colonizes value systems.
3		-The links establish how the aff has represented history without analyzing contingencies, which means they represent the aff as an inevitability. This representation of history being inevitable doesn't do what the standard calls for us to do, which means that what I've proved is that they're engaged in reproducing the colonization of time and value systems.
4		-
5		-
6		-===A2: Methods Bad===
7		-There are two different kinds of evaluations in debate, a question of HOW someone is evaluating the resolution, and the question of the impacts of evaluating the resolution. Necessarily, methods debate comes before RESULTS debate. A. they give no reasons why method kritiks are bad but B. even if they had methods kritiks are necessary to challenge our basic underlying assumptions on how we should enact the resolution- only through the selecting of counterfactuals and voting neg can we begin to see a change in how we represent the resolution. It doesn't specify a time- no reason why it's not open to interpretation.
8		-
9		-
10		-===A2 Link of Omission===
11		-
12		-
13		-====Our framework explains why the link of omission is HOW whiteness proliferates itself- it's the failure to interrogate the colonization of time and how whiteness has coerced us to sit back and ignore that history is coopted by whiteness. That we had no choice to challenge how it should have gone down.====
14		-
15		-
16		-====I should win because I am critiquing the knowledge structure of the aff.====
17		-
18		-
19		-==1NC – K ==
20		-
21		-
22		-===Part 1: Non-Ideal Framework===
23		-
24		-
25		-====The very use of ideal theory prevents achieving the ideal societies it tries to dictate.====
26		-**Mills 2** (Charles Mills. "'Ideal Theory' as Ideology" Hypatia. Vol. 20. No. 3. Summer 2005. — KW)
27		-"I suggest that this spontaneous reaction, far from being philosophically naïve or jejune
28		-AND
29		-that the ideal-as-idealized-model will never be achieved."
30		-
31		-
32		-====
33		-Perception is intrinsically tied to cognition which makes it crucial to interrogate our epistemology through non-ideal theory.====
34		-**Mills 3** ("White Ignorance" Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Published by the State University of New York Press. 2007 — KW)
35		-" Let us turn now to the processes of cognition, individual and social,
36		-AND
37		-embedded in sub theories and larger theories about how things work."
38		-
39		-
40		-
41		-====Whiteness proliferates itself in epistemologies through the racialization of time.====
42		-Mills 4 (Charles Mills "White Time, The Chronic Injustice of Ideal Theory," Department of Philosophy Northwestern University, Hutchins Center for African American Research. 2014 — IS
43		-Goody goes on to challenge hegemonic representations of a dynamic progressive West versus a static
44		-AND
45		-, scheduled for extinction (Brantlinger 2003 , pp. 2-3).
46		-
47		-
48		-====Thus, the standard for the round is to engage in historical analysis to unravel white supremacy's colonization of knowledge and value systems.====
49		-
50		-
51		-====Linking offense into this standard requires disrupting white time through the articulation of alternative histories that expose the contingencies of whiteness.====
52		-**Mills 5** (Charles Mills. "White Time: The Chronic Injustice of Ideal Theory" Du Bois Review. Vol. 11. No. 1. 2014 — KW)
53		-"Thus, as Hanchard ( 1999 ) emphasizes, the assertion of Black peoplehood
54		-AND
55		-theory fit in? And how does the Black challenge manifest itself here?"
56		-
57		-
58		-===Part 2: Links to the AFF===
59		-
60		-
61		-====First, The aff practices futurism- relying on the prospect of the future to relieve us of current suffering does nothing but allow that suffering to live on unchanged. We must look to the past to inform us of the present and future.====
62		-**Dillon** (Stephen Dillon. Stephen Dillon, assistant professor of Queer Studies, holds a B.A. from the University of Iowa and a Ph.D. in American Studies with a minor in Critical Feminist and Sexuality Studies from the University of Minnesota. "'It's here, it's that time:' Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames" Women and Performance: a journal of feminist theory. Vol. 23. No. 1. 20**13** — KW)
63		-"Hortense Spillers provides a powerful theorization of time as accumulation in her classic essay
64		-AND
65		-what the future will be. The future will be what was before."
66		-
67		-
68		-====Second, disguising white contingency. Whiteness is not ahistoric, but instead has emerged through historical contingencies.====
69		-**Yancy '04** (George Yancy. Dr. George Yancy is a Professor of Philosophy at Emory University. What White Looks Like: African-American Philosophers on the Whiteness Question. Published by Routledge 2004— KW)
70		-"A genealogical examination of whiteness, following the lead of Foucault and Nietzsche,
71		-AND
72		-body as a result of the internalization of the historical norms of whiteness."
73		-
74		-====Hindsight bias created by factual plans ignores contingencies and alternate histories.====
75		-Lebow 1 (Richard Lebow. Professor of International Political Theory in the Department of War Studies, King's College London and James O. Freedman Presidential Professor Emeritus at Dartmouth College, "What's so Different about a Counterfactual?" World Politics. Vol. 52. No. 4. July 2000 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054129 )
76		-"The disciplinary tendency to privilege structural explanations is reinforced by the "certainty of
77		-AND
78		-they could have made different choices that might have led to different outcomes."
79		-
80		-
81		-===Part 3: Alternative===
82		-
83		-
84		-====The alt is a counter-factually framed resolution: In 1954, following the Supreme Court decision in Brown v Board of Education, public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected free speech.====
85		-
86		-
87		-====The alternative is competitive on several levels:====
88		-
89		-
90		-====Methods debate:====
91		-
92		-
93		-
94		-====B. It competes through net benefits.. ====
95		-
96		-
97		-====This is a debate about sequencing. We must prioritize an absolute rejection of institutions of whiteness. Attempts to reform them without a counterfactual analysis guarantee ongoing genocide of black body. ====
98		-Perhaps, then, there is no
99		-AND
100		-is significantly dependent on our willingness to embrace this form of pedagogical audacity.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-04-09 03:15:45.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Shania Hunt

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Marlborough MC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-24

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Law Magnet Gao Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JANFEB - Counterfactual K V2

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NDCA

Caselist.RoundClass[27]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-04-12 18:38:55.32
	1	+2017-04-12 18:38:55.0