Changes for page Law Magnet Gao Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,22 +1,0 @@ 1 -==1 – T == 2 -Interpretation: The affirmative may only defend the that the United States extends housing assistance for homeless people 3 - 4 - 5 -====A right to housing refers to a policy targeted exclusively towards the homeless, not everybody. The affirmative may only defend house creation/affordability for the homeless. Morris 10==== 6 - 7 -Morris, 2010 ACADEMIC JOURNAL ARTICLE - Journal of Australian Political Economy, The Lack of a Right to Housing and Its Implications in Australia, By Morris, Alan, VOLUME/ISSUE: No. 65, PUBLICATION DATE: Winter 2010, 8 -These advances in the sphere 9 -AND 10 -and focuses mainly on homelessness. 11 - 12 -Extra – T spikes out of NEG links 13 - 14 -====Legal precisions outweighs limits and ground —- it's a prerequisite to effective policy education. Shannon.==== 15 -**Shannon 2** – Bradley Shannon, law at University of Idaho, January 2002 (Washington Law Review, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 65, Lexis 16 -The second answer to the question why we should care about the use of proper 17 -AND 18 -** and, consequently, the progress - of the law.** 19 - 20 -Predictability 21 - 22 -Limits - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-03-10 16:24:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Arun Sharma - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Westwood JA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -21 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Law Magnet Gao Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -MARAPR - Homeless T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TFA State