Changes for page Law Magnet Gao Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[26]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-03-10 16:24:53. 7021 +2017-03-10 16:24:53.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,22 @@ 1 +==1 – T == 2 +Interpretation: The affirmative may only defend the that the United States extends housing assistance for homeless people 3 + 4 + 5 +====A right to housing refers to a policy targeted exclusively towards the homeless, not everybody. The affirmative may only defend house creation/affordability for the homeless. Morris 10==== 6 + 7 +Morris, 2010 ACADEMIC JOURNAL ARTICLE - Journal of Australian Political Economy, The Lack of a Right to Housing and Its Implications in Australia, By Morris, Alan, VOLUME/ISSUE: No. 65, PUBLICATION DATE: Winter 2010, 8 +These advances in the sphere 9 +AND 10 +and focuses mainly on homelessness. 11 + 12 +Extra – T spikes out of NEG links 13 + 14 +====Legal precisions outweighs limits and ground —- it's a prerequisite to effective policy education. Shannon.==== 15 +**Shannon 2** – Bradley Shannon, law at University of Idaho, January 2002 (Washington Law Review, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 65, Lexis 16 +The second answer to the question why we should care about the use of proper 17 +AND 18 +** and, consequently, the progress - of the law.** 19 + 20 +Predictability 21 + 22 +Limits - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-10 16:24:54.131 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Arun Sharma - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Westwood JA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +21 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Law Magnet Gao Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +MARAPR - Homeless T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TFA State