Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[19]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[20]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[19]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-10 16:18:21.697
	1	+2017-03-10 16:18:21.0

Caselist.RoundClass[20]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-10 16:19:37.756
	1	+2017-03-10 16:19:37.0

Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,56 @@
	1	+==Part 1: Advocacy==
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Counter-Plan TEXT: The United States ought to guarantee a Basic Income, Van Der Veen: ====
	5	+Veen, Robert J. Van Der. "Real Freedom versus Reciprocity: Competing Views on the Justice of Unconditional Basic Income." Political Studies 46.1 (1998): 140-63. Web.
	6	+To put it simply, the basic income proposal aims to disburse a tax-
	7	+AND
	8	+income one actually earns, given the ruling structure of tax rates.3
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====The counter-plan solves the harms in the AFF.====
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+====Basic income breaks the cycle of poverty, Vinik 13:====
	15	+Vinik, Danny. "Everyone's Talking About This Simple Solution To Ending Poverty By Just Giving People Free Money." Business Insider. Business Insider, 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 05 Mar. 2017.
	16	+A simple idea for eliminating poverty is garnering greater attention in recent weeks: automatically
	17	+AND
	18	+found the disincentive effects on work are not as strong as economists feared.
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+====Basic income solves the root causes of homelessness, Santens 14:====
	22	+Santens, Scott. "Wouldn't Unconditional Basic Income Just Cause Massive Inflation? – Basic Income." Medium. Basic Income, 22 Nov. 2014. Web. 05 Mar. 2017.
	23	+There are five times more vacant homes than homeless people in the United States today
	24	+AND
	25	+and smart businesses will step into this space in hopes of dominating it.
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+==Part 2: Competition ==
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====The counter-plan is competitive with the AFF for 2 reasons:
	32	+====
	33	+First, the AFF and NEG are different starting points. The AFF's right to housing is aimed at solving one symptom of the harms coming from impoverished areas, while the NEG's basic income guarantee approaches the root cause by granting individuals the means necessary to make autonomous decisions. This means the AFF and NEG have different methods, which are competitive. Any perm that attempts to combine these two approaches represents a shift out of the AC, a third starting point, which is a combination of both methods.
	34	+Second, Responsible decision making. The counter-plan decisively solves for the material
	35	+AND
	36	+to any of the criticisms made against the AFF on the other flows.
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+==Part 3: Internal Benefits==
	40	+Because the Counter-Plan is competitive with the AFF and solves for the harms, you ought to prefer the Counter-plan because solving the harms by guaranteeing a basic income has additional benefits.
	41	+
	42	+
	43	+====Basic income promotes democratic freedom. ====
	44	+
	45	+
	46	+====Pateman 1:====
	47	+Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of a Basic Income Carole Pateman
	48	+Politics Society 2004; 32; 89 DOI: 10.1177/0032329203261100 The online version of this article can be found at: http://pas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/1/89
	49	+A basic income would have two important consequences for democratization. First, it would
	50	+AND
	51	+women to do a disproportionate share of unpaid work at home.
	52	+
	53	+1 Analytic
	54	+2 Analytic
	55	+3 Analytic
	56	+4 Analytic

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-10 16:19:40.881

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jerry Crist

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Flower Mound KW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+20

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Law Magnet Gao Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+MARAPR - BIGly CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+TFA State