Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[17]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[17]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-05-10 19:25:50.1
	1	+2017-05-10 19:25:50.0

Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,9 @@
	1	+====Only when we are free from our masculine restrictions can we then solve for hate speech and its violence against bodies deemed as Other====
	2	+Hatfield et al. 5 ~~Hatfield, Katherine L., Schafer, Kellie, Stroup, Christopher A., 2005, Atlantic Journal of Communication, "A Dialogic Approach to Combating Hate Speech on College Campuses", acc. 7/11/16, School of Communication Studies Ohio University, Speech Communication and Dramatic Arts Central Michigan University, School of Communication Studies Ohio University, pp. 43~~KAE
	3	+
	4	+Owen (1998) wrote that "words can turn into bullets, hate speech can kill and maim, just as censorship can ... we are forced to ask: is there a moment where the quantitative consequences of hate speech change qualitatively the arguments about how we must deal with it?" (p. 37). This study was conducted to determine whether engaging students in discourse about hate speech would affect their perceptions of the appropriateness of hate speech. Tests indicated that when engaged in the discourse, participants are more likely to decrease their perception of appropriateness and have a more overt reaction to the hate messages.
	5	+
	6	+====Turn – the censorship that the aff opposes actually translates to challenging academic spaces and comfortability in criticisms which is key to a successful movement ====
	7	+Ahmed 15 (Sara Ahmed is formerly the director of a new Centre for Feminist Research (CFR) at Goldsmiths, Professor of Race and Cultural Studies at Goldsmiths, and a scholar that writes on the intersection of queer theory, feminist theory, critical race theory, and post-colonialism/ Ahmed, Sara. Article from her independent research blog: Against Students Posted on June 25, 2015. Web. //Accessed 2/16/17 KAE)
	8	+
	9	+So much violence is justified and repeated by how those who refuse to participate in violence are judged. We need to make a translation. The idea that being over-sensitive is what stops us from addressing difficult issues can be translated as: we can’t be racist because you are too sensitive to racism. Well then: we need to be too sensitive if we are to challenge what is not being addressed. We might still need to ask: what is meant by addressing difficult issues? It is worth me noting that I have been met with considerable resistance from critical academics when trying to discuss issues of racism, power and sexism on campus. Some academics seem comfortable talking about these issues when they are safely designated as residing over there. Is this "there" what allows "difficult issues" not to be addressed here? In fact, it seems to me that it is often students who are leading discussions of "difficult issues" on campus. But when students lead these discussions they are then dismissed as behaving as consumers or as being censoring. How quickly another figure comes up, when one figure is exposed as fantasy. If not over-sensitive, then censoring; if not censoring, then consuming. And so on, and so forth. My own sense: our feminist political hopes rest with over-sensitive students. Over-sensitive can be translated as: sensitive to that which is not over. All of these ways of making students into the problem work to create a picture of professors or academics as the ones who are "really" oppressed by students. This is what it means to articulate a position or a view "against students." One US professor speaks of being "frightened" by his liberal students. He blames so much on "identity politics." And indeed so much is blamed on identity politics: that term is used whenever we challenge how spaces are occupied. It has become another easy dismissal. We are learning here about professors (their investments, emotions and strategies of dismissal) more than we are learning about students.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-05-10 19:25:50.403

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+11

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lake Travis Ehresman Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Feminist Killjoy K - Hate Speech Addon

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard