| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,100 @@ |
|
1 |
+====First, the purpose of debate education should be to train youth to challenge oppressive structures, not perpetuate them,==== |
|
2 |
+**Bohmer 91** "Teaching Privileged Students about Gender, Race, and Class Oppression." Teaching Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 2 (April, 1991) pp. 154-163. |
|
3 |
+Our strong emphasis on institutional oppression is not only due to our |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+ways of introducing race, gender, and class into the sociology curriculum. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====Second, structural violence excludes certain individuals from the moral sphere, meaning it’s impossible to create a coherent moral code without resolving issues of structural violence ==== |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Third, Ideal theory ignores histories of injustice in its attempt to generalize a perfect society. Non Ideal theory is the only option to recognize and resist recreating injustice==== |
|
10 |
+**Mills 2** "Ideal Theory" as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS |
|
11 |
+The crucial common claim—whether couched in terms of ideology and fetishism, or |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+the more local level, the descriptive concepts arrived at may be misleading. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Fourth, discussions cannot be based on ideal theory- we must engage in real world discussions but those discussions mean nothing unless they change the values to the people they affect,==== |
|
17 |
+**Curry 14** Dr. Tommy J. Curry 1 The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century. 2014 |
|
18 |
+Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+used to currently justify the living wages in under our contemporary moral parameters. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+====Therefore, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who takes the best action to improve conditions for marginalized groups. This requires state action, not just critical reflection- moving away from the state dooms the lefts’ critique to failure—we must work within the state without being statist, meaning if the neg alt isn’t a state policy I’m the only one with a risk of offense==== |
|
23 |
+**Connally 2k8 **~~William, Professor of Political Science at John Hopkins, Capitalism and Christianity, American Style, page numbers are at the bottom of the card.~~ |
|
24 |
+Before turning to possible strategies to promote these objectives, we need to face an |
|
25 |
+AND |
|
26 |
+were it to occur, would undermine rather than vitalize democratic culture. |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+====Implications:==== |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====A) Ceding the political leaves politics to the right; we probably don’t want Trump as president so we cant avoid politics entirely. B) Even if the state is implicitly bad, winning aff solvency shows a shift from its representations. C), State is necessary to affect material oppression in the AC.==== |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+====Thus I advocate that countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power ==== |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+==Contention 1: Indigenous sovereignty == |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+====Colonialism has been a implicit part of American patriotism – first they took away the land and forced indigenous peoples onto reservations and now they are taking away the remaining red sovereignty by bribing and abusing the indigenous land and reservations by placing dangerous nuclear power plants ==== |
|
42 |
+**Angel 91** Bradley (an international leader in the environmental health and justice movement, working with communities to stop pollution threats and to promote pollution prevention) "The Toxic Threat to Indian Lands" Greenpeace 1991 http://www.ejnet.org/ej/toxicthreattoindianlands.pdf DOA: 8.11.16//KAE |
|
43 |
+Five hundred years ago explorer Christopher Columbus sailed from Europe, setting in motion a |
|
44 |
+AND |
|
45 |
+traditions and sovereignty becomes known, resistance by Indian people has spread rapidly. |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+====Aboriginals and indigenous peoples face similar discrimination ==== |
|
49 |
+**Green 16 **Radioactive waste and the nuclear war on Australia's Aboriginal people Jim Green 1st July 2016 http://www.theecologist.org/News/news'analysis/2987853/radioactive'waste'and'the'nuclear'war'on'australias'aboriginal'people.html Dr James "Jim" Green is the national anti-nuclear campaigner with Friends of the Earth Australia and Australian coordinator of the Beyond Nuclear Initiative.~~1~~ Green is a regular media commentator on nuclear waste issues.~~2~~ He has an honours degree in public health from the University of Wollongong and was awarded a PhD in science and technology studies for his analysis of the Lucas Heights research reactor debates.~~3~~ |
|
50 |
+This isn't the first time that Aboriginal people in South Australia have faced the imposition |
|
51 |
+AND |
|
52 |
+This took place with no forewarning and no consultation with Aboriginal people. |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+==== Prohibiting productin of nuclear power solves; eliminates the need for waste disposal and ==== |
|
56 |
+**Rozman 14** Izzati (Scholar and Author) "ARGUMENTATIVE REPORT SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT NUCLEAR POWER ENERGY BE BANNED GLOBALLY?" University Sultan Zainal Abidin, 2014 https://www.academia.edu/10107346/ARGUMENTATIVE'REPORT'SHOULD'OR'SHOULD'NOT'NUCLEAR'POWER'ENERGY'BE'BANNED'GLOBALLY DOA: 8.11.16//KAE |
|
57 |
+Nuclear power should be banned globally not because of the availability of extensive reasons that |
|
58 |
+AND |
|
59 |
+depleting precious potable water resources and bring hazardous effect towards human and environment. |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+==Contention 2: Japan == |
|
63 |
+ |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+====Nuclear power production entered Japan into an age of racial violence ==== |
|
66 |
+**Shrader-Frechette 1 **ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Volume 5, Number 3, 2012 a Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/env.2011.0045 Nuclear Catastrophe, Disaster-Related Environmental Injustice, and Fukushima, Japan: Prima-Facie Evidence for a Japanese ‘‘Katrina’’ Kristin Shrader-Frechette http://www3.nd.edu/~~kshrader/pubs/ksf-ej-2012-fukushima.pdf // KAE |
|
67 |
+Besides poor people, prima-facie, pre-FD-accident evidence also |
|
68 |
+AND |
|
69 |
+DREI victims? To answer these questions, consider first the FD accident. |
|
70 |
+ |
|
71 |
+ |
|
72 |
+====Environmental injustice threats following nuclear power disasters promote racist and classist culture divides==== |
|
73 |
+**Shrader-Frechette 2** ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Volume 5, Number 3, 2012 a Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/env.2011.0045 Nuclear Catastrophe, Disaster-Related Environmental Injustice, and Fukushima, Japan: Prima-Facie Evidence for a Japanese ‘‘Katrina’’ Kristin Shrader-Frechette http://www3.nd.edu/~~kshrader/pubs/ksf-ej-2012-fukushima.pdf // KAE |
|
74 |
+Because Japan has few minorities, one might expect that its environmental-injustice |
|
75 |
+AND |
|
76 |
+that is able to assess the ultima-facie case for FD EI. |
|
77 |
+ |
|
78 |
+ |
|
79 |
+==Contention 3: Masculinity == |
|
80 |
+ |
|
81 |
+ |
|
82 |
+====Nuclear power personifies a male structure perpetuating forms of masculine domination ==== |
|
83 |
+**Caputi 04**, Jane Goddesses and Monsters: Women, Myth, Power, and Popular Culture https://books.google.com/books/about/Goddesses'and'Monsters.html?id=C'r6meksRjUCandprintsec=frontcoverandsource=kp'read'button~~#v=onepageandq=nuclearandf=false 2004// KAE |
|
84 |
+Feminist criticism has focused on exposing what Diana Russell (1989) calls "nuclear |
|
85 |
+AND |
|
86 |
+place, the mother’s body (Porter, 1991, 104-5). |
|
87 |
+ |
|
88 |
+ |
|
89 |
+====Nuclear power is the symbol of masculinity – a political artifact that rapes the earth and creates a monopolization of control over the notion of femininity. Maintaining production of the atom bomb replicates the hierarchal chain of command and oppressive power structures that follow from nuclear power ==== |
|
90 |
+**Grint and Gill 95** The Gender-technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research By Keith Grint, Rosalind Gill//KAE |
|
91 |
+nuclear technology is a useful example to illustrate some fundamental differences in approach to technology |
|
92 |
+AND |
|
93 |
+that it be controlled by a centralized, rigidly hierarchical chain of command. |
|
94 |
+ |
|
95 |
+ |
|
96 |
+====Nuclear weapons support the Patriarchy and male dominations==== |
|
97 |
+**Canberra 84 **Published by Friends of the Earth (Canberra) in January 1984, ISBN 0 909313 27 X (pdf of original). A condensed version was published in Social Alternatives, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1986, pp. 9-16.//KAE |
|
98 |
+Patriarchy - the collective domination of men over women - and other major social structures |
|
99 |
+AND |
|
100 |
+imagine the development of nuclear weapons in a society where feminine values predominated. |