Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[9]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[9]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-17 00:25:54.920
	1	+2017-01-17 00:25:54.0

Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,33 @@
	1	+====Violence against womyn in systems of white supremacy become internalized – marked identities begin to desire the purity of unmarked whiteness, and thus normalize their world view. Oppression thus becomes a condition of happiness – women are happy in the kitchen, they don’t want to go out to work. The ultimate form of white patriarchy is the oppressed desiring their own oppression, and we need to disrupt this naïve happiness.====
	2	+**Ahmed 10** Sara, 1/1/2010. Professor of Race and Cultural Studies, Goldsmiths College, University of London. The Promise of Happiness. Duke University Press.
	3	+It is Sophy’s imagination… right way, to be assembled.
	4	+
	5	+====People do not take women seriously when they speak – now you have to. Rearticulation serves as a method to sever the ties of the power within language and speech acts from its historically gendered and racialized history. Nagging and disrupting the white-male hegemonic institutions in the academy creates a disruption of the language game that exists in the academy. Only by antagonizing the principles of exclusion can we disorient the habitual spaces of whiteness which is a prerequisite to combatting other forms of oppression ====
	6	+**Patton 04** (Dr. Tracey Owens Patton is the director of African American and Diaspora Studies and a professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at the University of Wyoming. Dr. Patton's area of expertise is critical cultural communication and rhetorical studies.2004 Reflections of a Black Woman Professor: Racism and Sexism in Academia, Howard Journal of Communications, 15:3, 197-198, Accessed 6/27/16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10646170490483629)
	7	+Through my personal…common set of struggles.
	8	+
	9	+====Thus I affirm the entirety of the resolution. We affirm to open up a space to endorse the feminist kill joy and creates sites of discourse that disorients and reconfigures the social order. ====
	10	+**Ahmed 10** Sara Ahmed "Feminist Killjoys (And Other Willful Subjects)" The Scholar and Feminist Online The Barnard Center for Research on Women Summer 2010
	11	+To be unseated… We must learn.
	12	+
	13	+====Our affirmative approach as a foundational criticism is necessary to resolve the structural antagonisms that formulate law – even the most progressive left legal reforms recreate those problems and attempt to disentangle the complexities of gender issues - Our aff is a prerequisite ====
	14	+**Brown and Halley 02 **Wendy Brown and Janet Halley, 2002 (Left Legalism/Left Critique, Wendy Brown is First Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley, where she is also affiliated with the Department of Rhetoric, and where she is a core faculty member in the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory. Janet Halley is the Royall Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. p. 18-25)
	15	+Left legalistic projects… that bred them.
	16	+
	17	+====The notion of free speech assumes that all voices are equally treated, when in reality power inequities shape who can speak what====
	18	+**Boler 2k** Megan Boler (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of "Affirmative Action Pedagogy," Philosophy of Education, 2000
	19	+All speech is not … limiting dominant voices.
	20	+
	21	+====Oppression in debate is perpetuated by the decisions community members make on a weekly basis. We look to real world implications in order to access debate’s liberatory potential. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the best resistance strategy for the oppressed. ====
	22	+Smith 13, Elijah. A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate
	23	+It will be … students cannot escape.
	24	+
	25	+====Freedom of speech requires emancipation from social oppression – The aff challenge traditional notions of free speech from a negative individual right to an opportunity to subvert disempowerment. Instead of viewing freedom of speech as a negative individual right, we should understand it as the right to speak up.  ====
	26	+**Hornsby 95** Jennifer Hornsby "Disempowered Speech" University of Arkansas Press Philosophical Topics, Vol. 23, No. 2, Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality (FALL 1995),
	27	+Free speech, or …. will be indispensable.
	28	+
	29	+====If that speech was too shrill for you then that’s part of the problem. Feminine participation and speech inside of the debate space is constantly suppressed to a relegated status of happiness and conformity. ====
	30	+**Feinzig and Atyeo 11 **An Analysis of Gender Disparities in Lincoln-Douglas Debate Joshua Feinzig
	31	+Natalie Atyeo
	32	+Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School October 2, 2011 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract'id=1957437
	33	+Though the cited … lower vocal pitches.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-17 00:25:59.952

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nik Patel, Lu Barazza, Zachary Zertuche

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westwood AG

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+9

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Semis

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lake Travis Ehresman Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - The nag AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Churchill