Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,10 +1,0 @@
1		-**A Interpretation: If the aff defends multiple country action they must only defend action by an international body or only defend a multilateral treaty agreement to ban nuclear power amongst the agents of the aff.**
2		-
3		-**B Violation:**
4		-
5		-**C Vote neg:
6		-Real world. GAUN 13:**
7		-General Assembly of the United Nations. “High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on Nuclear Disarmament (26 September 2013).” No Date of Publishment. .LHP MK
8		-A number of multilateral … the Disarmament Commission.
9		-
10		-**Topicality is a reason to vote negative - fairness and jurisdiction. Do not grant the affirmative a voting issue. Adopt a competing interpretations paradigm when evaluating the counter-interpretation and interpretation dualism. Drop the affirmative team for dropping the argument is comparatively worse**

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-14 02:51:34.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Panel

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harrison RP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-12

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lake Highland Khattak Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPOCT - T - Multilateral

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Bronx RR