| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+**The aff burden is to prove the state can instill an absolute prohibition. If the state can’t take the position of an absolute prohibition, you negate. Prefer textually ~-~-- a prohibition is contingent on the state’s ability to exercise its authority. OXFORD DICTIONARIES:** |
|
2 |
+Oxford Dictionaries. “Definition of Prohibit in English.” No date. All brackets are originally from the evidence. LHP MK |
|
3 |
+VERB (prohibits, prohibiting...any tax cuts |
|
4 |
+**Text is a side constraint to other interps of the res since it establishes what it means which controls fairness and education.** |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+**The sovereign is the only one that has the authority to choose if the law is applicable, creating a state of exception, so any legal action is not binding. AGAMBEN:** |
|
7 |
+Bracketed for gendered language. Agamben, Giorgio. “Homo Sacer – Sovereign Power and Bare Life”. Translated by Daniel Heller-Rozan LHP AA |
|
8 |
+The paradox of...an exception (Ausnahme). |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+**That negates: |
|
11 |
+A Analytic |
|
12 |
+B Turns case ~-~-- in the state of exception infinite violence is permissible. GUVEN:** |
|
13 |
+Guven, Ferit. “Decolonizing Democracy.” Lexington Books. LHP MK |
|
14 |
+The second characteristic...argument against dehumanization. |