| ... |
... |
@@ -1,17
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**The aff burden is to prove the state can instill an absolute prohibition, the neg burden is to prove otherwise. To clarify, when the state prohibits X action, they exert its authority to dictate the practice ought not exist. If the state can’t take the position of an absolute prohibition, you negate. Prefer textually ~-~-- a prohibition is contingent on the state’s ability to exercise its authority. OXFORD DICTIONARIES:** |
| 2 |
|
-Oxford Dictionaries. “Definition of Prohibit in English.” No date. All brackets are originally from the evidence. LHP MK |
| 3 |
|
-VERB (prohibits, prohibiting...any tax cuts |
| 4 |
|
-**Text is a side constraint to other interps of the res since it establishes what it means which controls fairness and education. More warrants: |
| 5 |
|
-1 Real world |
| 6 |
|
-2 Intrinsic feature of obligations |
| 7 |
|
-3 Hijacks pragmatism** |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-**The constitutive feature of the law is that the sovereign can create it ~-~-- the sovereign lives outside of the law. This means the sovereign is the only one that has the authority to choose if the law is applicable, creating a state of exception, so any legal action is not binding. AGAMBEN:** |
| 10 |
|
-Bracketed for gendered language. Agamben, Giorgio. “Homo Sacer – Sovereign Power and Bare Life”. Translated by Daniel Heller-Rozan LHP AA |
| 11 |
|
-The paradox of...an exception (Ausnahme). |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-**That negates: |
| 14 |
|
-A Analytic |
| 15 |
|
-B Turns case ~-~-- in the state of exception infinite violence is permissible. GUVEN:** |
| 16 |
|
-Guven, Ferit. “Decolonizing Democracy.” Lexington Books. LHP MK |
| 17 |
|
-The second characteristic...argument against dehumanization. |