| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**A Interpretation: the aff must not defend a limitation of qualified immunity in response to a specific class of crimes.** |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-**B Violation:** |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-*C Vote Neg:** |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-**Topic lit ~-~-- Qualified immunity is determined in light of an officer’s duties in the abstract, not specific crimes or situations they are confronted in. WAXMAN ’03:** |
| 8 |
|
-Waxman, Seth P. and Morrison, Trevor W. “What Kind of Immunity? Federal Officers, State Criminal Law, and the Supremacy Clause.” 6/8/2003. LHP MK |
| 9 |
|
-This Article proceeds...for federal officers. |