| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+**Recognition is the wrong starting point. SALDANHA:** |
|
2 |
+“Psychedelic White: Goa Trance and the Viscosity of Race,” Arun Saldanha, 2007 LHP AA” |
|
3 |
+My disagreement is...into the universal. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+**They recreate the oppression they try to fight ~-~-- in attempting to eliminate difference through a politics of inclusion, they in turn target individuals who represent deviancy. EVANS ’10:** |
|
6 |
+Brad Evans, 2010 “Foucault’s Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century,” Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424. |
|
7 |
+Imposing liberalism has...the analytical arena. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+**The alternative is to dismantle the face - that disavows the normative value of faciality machines. BIGNALL ’12:** |
|
10 |
+Bignall, Simone. “Dismantling the Face: Pluralism and the Politics of Recognition.” University of New South Wales. 2012. LHP MK |
|
11 |
+Deleuze and Guattari...principles into practice. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+**The role of the ballot is to vote for the better debate that best interrogates the oppressive politics of recognition. MACCORMACK:** |
|
14 |
+Maccormack, Patricia “Faciality” http://archeologia.women.it/user/quarta/workshops/spectacles2/patriciamaccormack.htm LHP AA |
|
15 |
+I would add...the ‘individual’ face. |