| ... |
... |
@@ -1,23
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-KANT NC - R1 |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-**I value morality. First ethics inextricably assumes individuals have the freedom to endorse ethical thought. RIPSTEIN:** |
| 4 |
|
-Arthur Ripstein. “Force and Freedom” University of Toronto. Section II: Stages of Kant's Argument. Pg. 13 and 14. LHP MK |
| 5 |
|
-The Universal Principle...you will pursue. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-**Independently, ethics must be consistent with the unity of action:** |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-**A Infinite subdivisions of ends** |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-**B Intentions are binding** |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-**This binds us to maintaining equal outer freedom - it's key to maintain consistency in the ends we promote** |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-**Thus the standard is maintaining a system of equal outer freedom** |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-**Qualified immunity prevents individuals from being held accountable when there is a good will, they don't know they're in violation of the law at the time. ZIPURSKY:** |
| 18 |
|
-Zipursky, Benjamin. “Reasonableness in and Out of Negligence Law.” No Date. Pg. 11 and 12. LHP MK |
| 19 |
|
-In certain parts...of reasonable mistake. |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-**That’s key to maintaining an omnilateral will’s legitimacy - police officers act within the confines of their own rational volition, so there’s no bad will RIPSTEIN 2:** |
| 22 |
|
-Ripstein, Arthur. “Equality, Responsibility, and the Law.” Cambridge University and Press. Pg. 267 and 269. LHP TLO |
| 23 |
|
-A reasonable balance...one the same. |