Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[14]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[14]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-19 18:57:53.419
	1	+2016-11-19 18:57:53.0

Caselist.CitesClass[13]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,76 @@
	1	+**Framework**
	2	+
	3	+**Identity is normative - agents act off of what’s endowed off their identity - someone isn’t obligated to jump in a house to put out a fire unless they’re a fire fighter. Identity exists through structures of recognition - norms that recognize particular subjects and define the subject. BUTLER ’92:**
	4	+(Judith Butler. 1992. “Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” Feminists Theorize the Political)
	5	+In a sense...to politics itself.
	6	+
	7	+**Identity exists in communities that inherently discriminate - forming them and differentiating from the other **
	8	+
	9	+**Our alterity with the other is undecidable ~-~-- we can’t know what the other wills since their perspective is epistemically inaccessible. There’s always the capacity for us to misunderstand the other ~-~-- any account of them undermines how they view themselves. YOUNG ’97: **
	10	+Young, Iris Marion. “Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy.” 1997. LHP MK
	11	+Benhabib appeals to...moral judgment involves.
	12	+
	13	+**Inability to understand the other's motive makes life precarious - we're vulnerable to their judgement and our world view can shift**
	14	+
	15	+**Precariousness and our vulnerability to the other frames ethics ~-~-- it conditions how we enter vulnerable ethical relations. This reaffirms social relations that inherently discriminate ~-~-- different identities are intelligible based on what’s understood as true from what others tell us. The dependency on sociality means identities have to satisfy the social conditions established to be recognized within the community. BUTLER 2:**
	16	+Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. End of intro pages 24-32. LHP MK
	17	+The precarity of...of its effects.
	18	+
	19	+**This structure of recognition is created by social norms which discriminate between different approaches to identity to warrant that some require mourning while others don’t. I don’t see some pure understanding of the other, I isolate particular features which are socially constructed ~-~-- grievability nullifies the value of individuals based off their identity, valuing some over others. BUTLER 3:**
	20	+Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. End of intro pages 24-32. LHP MK
	21	+We read about...from the start.
	22	+
	23	+**Thus the standard and role of the ballot is to endorse the advocacy that best renders ungrievable lives grievable. The structures that render some lives grievable aren’t static ~-~-- they require reproduction, by refusing to reiterate normative frames that render life ungrievable, we reconstruct them. BUTLER 4:**
	24	+Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. End of intro pages 24-32. LHP MK
	25	+“Although precarious life...intervention as well.”
	26	+
	27	+**Prefer independently ~-~-- prior to addressing what oppression is, we need to first understand that oppressed lives are valuable, otherwise movements against oppression get co-opted by sociality. BUTLER 5:**
	28	+Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. End of intro pages 24-32. LHP MK
	29	+The epistemological capacity...recognized as lives.
	30	+
	31	+**Impact calc:**
	32	+**1 No link consequentialism -~~-~- the question isn’t how you distribute or solve for harms, rather their frames. BUTLER 6:**
	33	+Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. End of intro pages 24-32. LHP MK
	34	+We have decided...allocate recognition differentially.
	35	+
	36	+**2 There’s no pre-post fiat distinction for framework. I ethically justified my framework so the judge has pre fiat obligation to endorse it to promote ethical thought, otherwise debate would become a training ground for ethically bankrupt thinkers without empathy for real-world problems. KOH AND NIEMI:**
	37	+“A Call for Polyvocal Debate.” Benjamin Koh and Rebar Niemi.
	38	+Debate is foundationally...breaking those rules.
	39	+
	40	+**Offense**
	41	+
	42	+**Despite documentation of police brutality, those responsible face no repercussions. Translating lives lost through imagery is insufficient ~-~-- only legal recourse as a response to racism brings a meaningful sense of grievablity by punishing their killers. SEYHAN ’16: **
	43	+Seyhan, Eda. “When Seeing Isn’t Believing: On Images of Police Brutality.” Critical Legal Thinking: Law and the Political. August 5, 2016. LHP MK
	44	+The increased visibility...saturated by race.
	45	+
	46	+**Police officers can get away with violating specific, ungrievable rights without recourse, recreating lack of recognition in the law. WAGNER ’14:**
	47	+DePaul Law Review Volume 63 Issue 3 Spring 2014: Symposium - Great Lakes: Article 7 Emerging Issues for Freshwater Resources Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: "e Problems with the Quali#ed Immunity Doctrine Robin B. Wagner. LHP JN
	48	+Therefore, when three...from the law.
	49	+
	50	+**the choice to shoot someone is preferable because lack of recognition in the law. CROCKFORD ’15:**
	51	+Crockford, Kade. “Militarization of Police and Racial Justice Gone Wrong: The Eurie Stamps Tragedy.” September 29, 2015. LHP MK
	52	+Duncan invokes the...your prior conduct.
	53	+
	54	+**Now affirm:**
	55	+
	56	+**1 Normative change ~-~-- the aff ruptures the frames that render lives ungrievable. By granting those harmed legal leverage, they get to contest norms that disenfranchise them. WRIGHT ‘15:**
	57	+Wright, Sam. “Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity.” Above the Law. November 3, 2015. LHP MK
	58	+As usual, I’ve...will avoid accountability.
	59	+
	60	+**2 Qualified immunity as a doctrine assumes individuals don’t have rights unless ‘clearly established,’ but that model violates the rights of minorities who aren’t already recognized by society. SAND ’13:**
	61	+Sand, Georgia. “Ignorance of the Law is Legally an Excuse for Police Officers.” March 15, 2013. LHP MK
	62	+However, there is...of the law.
	63	+
	64	+**3Cognition ~-~-- Qualified immunity justifies existing bias against minorities. CARRIÉ ’15:**
	65	+Carrié, Shawn. “Why do police officers keep killing unarmed black men?” The Daily Dot. March 12, 2015. LHP MK
	66	+Why do police...actually save lives.
	67	+
	68	+**Underview:**
	69	+
	70	+**1 Engagement with the state is not synonymous with endorsement of state norms. Rather the pragmatic policy approach of the aff can be utilized with other ideologies. BRYANT ’12:**
	71	+Bryant 12 Levi Bryant (Professor of Philosophy at Collin College) “A Critique of the Academic Left” 2012 https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/
	72	+Unfortunately, the academic... etc., etc., etc.
	73	+
	74	+**2 speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. COVERSTONE ’05:**
	75	+Coverstone 5 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005
	76	+An important concern...of political power.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-19 18:57:56.128

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Madeline Norman

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Anderson JT

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+14

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lake Highland Khattak Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC - 1AC - Grievability

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Glenbrooks