| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,57 @@ |
|
1 |
+**Framework:** |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+**Identity is created through a constant intersubjective interaction with the other.** |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+**Now, there are two types of recognition – the identity model and the social model – the identity model fails ~-~-- it doesn’t account for the complexity of agents, while also ignoring transcultural interaction. FRASER 1:** |
|
6 |
+Fraser, Nancy. “Recognition Without Ethics?”. LHP AA |
|
7 |
+The key to my...forms of communitarianism.2 |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+**The solution is a system of recognition that focuses on the social model, rather than the identity model. FRASER 2:** |
|
10 |
+Fraser, Nancy. “Recognition Without Ethics?”. LHP AA |
|
11 |
+For these reasons, I shall...Or so I shall argue next. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+**And, this produces an obligation to engage in redistribution. FRASER 3:** |
|
14 |
+Fraser, Nancy. Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, Stanford University, April 30 – May 2, 1996. LHP AA |
|
15 |
+Given the hollowness...to the other. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+**Thus the standard and ROB is consistency with participatory parity. ** |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+**Academia is at risk – the police force has been militarized – stop and frisk victim’s become disposable targets by the neoliberal state. GIROUX 15:** |
|
20 |
+Henry A. Giroux. “Youth in Authoritarian Times: Challenging Neoliberalism's Politics of Disposability” October 21 2015. LHP AA |
|
21 |
+As the war on … form of militarism. (34) |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+**And, stop and frisk is an epidemic – despite disproving evidence, politicians spin it is a ‘crime fighting’ tool, while evidentially targeting certain individuals . GRAHAM 9/21:** |
|
24 |
+David A. Graham. “Stop-and-Frisk: Trump's Bad Idea for Fighting Crime”. Sep 21 2016. LHP AA |
|
25 |
+Trump’s answer comes...lowest on record. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+**Now, the inherency - qualified immunity defense is increasing in the context of civil litigation. KINPORTS 16:** |
|
28 |
+2016. The Supreme Court's Quiet Expansion of Qualified Immunity Kit Kinports Penn State Law. LHP AA |
|
29 |
+CONCLUSION In recent...resolving their claims. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+**Thus, the plan – resolved: The Supreme Court should overturn their 1967 ruling in Pierson v. Ray, which began qualified immunity. I will specify the extent of the limit and other concerns in CX. SILBER ‘85: ** |
|
32 |
+Silber, Douglas Noah. “Casenotes: Judicial Immunity — State Judicial Officials Are Not Immune from Prospective Relief in an Action Brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or from Paying Attorney 's Fees to Prevailing Parties Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Pulliam v. Allen, 104 S. Ct. 1970 (1984).” University of Baltimore School of Law. 1985. LHP MK |
|
33 |
+The Pulliam Court...damages suits. 105 |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+**And, Pierson v. Ray started the culture of qualified immunity and illegal police action – the plan is key. BERNICK ’15:** |
|
36 |
+Bernick, Evan. “To Hold Police Accountable, Don’t Give Them Immunity.” Foundation for Economic Education. May 6, 2015. LHP MK |
|
37 |
+In the 1967 case...on the merits. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+**The plan causes a shift away from stop and frisk – empirical data proves three points of improvement that civil litigation has. MORROW ET AL 15:** |
|
40 |
+Morrow et Al 15’- Wesont, Federal Civil Litigation as an Instrument of Police Reform: A Natural Experiment Exploring the Effects of the Floyd Ruling on Stop-and-Frisk Activities in New York City† Michael D. White, Ph.D.* Henry F. Fradella, J.D., Ph.D. Weston J. Morrow, Ph.D.* Doug Mellom, M.S. LHP FD |
|
41 |
+The current study examines...from 2011 to 2014. |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+**And, qualified immunity was the barrier to the type of litigation needed – means the plan solves. MORROW ET AL 2:** |
|
44 |
+Morrow et Al 15’- Wesont, Federal Civil Litigation as an Instrument of Police Reform: A Natural Experiment Exploring the Effects of the Floyd Ruling on Stop-and-Frisk Activities in New York City† Michael D. White, Ph.D.* Henry F. Fradella, J.D., Ph.D. Weston J. Morrow, Ph.D. Doug Mellom, M.S. LHP AA |
|
45 |
+By stopping an...procedures are inadequate. |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+**Legislative mechanism prevents police reform from being voted on – only the 1AC’s judicial litigation will resolve it. MORROW ET AL 3:** |
|
48 |
+Morrow et Al 15’- Wesont, Federal Civil Litigation as an Instrument of Police Reform: A Natural Experiment Exploring the Effects of the Floyd Ruling on Stop-and-Frisk Activities in New York City† Michael D. White, Ph.D.* Henry F. Fradella, J.D., Ph.D. Weston J. Morrow, Ph.D. Doug Mellom, M.S. LHP FD |
|
49 |
+The federal court...federal civil litigation |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+**And, stop and frisk perpetuates a culture of violence – it is unequally targeted, which creates the perception that the police are not there to help – only tangible political reform like the 1AC will solve. SIMMONS 14:** |
|
52 |
+Fall 2014. Kami Chavis Simmons. “The Law As Violence: Essay: The Legacy Of Stop And Frisk: Addressing The Vestiges Of A Violent Police Culture” 49 Wake Forest L. Rev. 849. LHP AA |
|
53 |
+In the introduction...politically legitimate reforms. |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+**The plan causes less lower court confusion which lets for fair application of the law. STEFAN 16:** |
|
56 |
+Lindsey De Stefan. “‘No Man Is Above the Law and No Man Is Below It:’ How Qualified Immunity Reform Could Create Accountability and Curb Widespread Police Misconduct.” The article claims it’s from 2017 but let’s just go 2016 to be safe. Seton Hall University. http://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1861andcontext=student_scholarship. LHP SG |
|
57 |
+Altering the qualified...the citizenpolice relationship. |