Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[18]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,13 +1,0 @@
1		-**A Interpretation: the aff must not read a plan inclusive counterplan, read an NC that says the aff is not an emotive statement, and read separate hijacks to the aff framework with a delineated disad.**
2		-
3		-**A Interpretation: The neg must concede the aff framework as contextualized in the 1AC.**
4		-
5		-**A Interpretation: All negative advocacies must be defended as unconditional or dispositional.**
6		-
7		-**A Interpretation: Debaters must read citations for all their evidence and flash it on the speech doc in the first speech.**
8		-
9		-**A Interpretation: the negative must not justify both a counter-factual version of the aff as a reason to negate and that granting free speech is bad under a different normative theory.**
10		-
11		-**A Interpretation: The negative must not read a framework indict that is implicated as both a presumption/permissibility trigger and a pre-fiat reason for the judge to drop them and read independent case turns to the affirmative.**
12		-
13		-**A Interpretation: The negative must not read both substantive and pre-fiat justifications for why the affirmative framework ought to be rejected.**

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-19 20:20:20.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-19

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Octas

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lake Highland Khattak Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1 - Broken Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X