| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,41 @@ |
|
1 |
+**Agents cannot be understood in and of themselves but rather through community – their identity is constituted by exposure to other agents. MAY '97:** |
|
2 |
+May, Todd. “Reconsidering Difference: Nancy, Derrida, Levinas, and Deleuze.” Pennsylvania State University. 1997. LHP MK |
|
3 |
+For Nancy, the...individual is impossible. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+**The organic community’s attempt to derive a perfect, unified essence of what community ought to look like presupposes this idealized model of subjectivity. MAY 2:** |
|
6 |
+May, Todd. “Reconsidering Difference: Nancy, Derrida, Levinas, and Deleuze.” Pennsylvania State University. 1997. LHP MK |
|
7 |
+For Nancy, any...traversing innumerable significations. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+**However, the empirical does not fully reflect the ontological, our quantum flux is indeterminate in a way that human subjecthood and worldliness is immanized. ROLLI:** |
|
10 |
+Rolli, Marc. “Immanence and Transcendence” Bulletin de la Sociite Amincaine de Philosophie de Langue Franfais Volume 14, Number 2, Fall 2004. LHP AER-POTATO |
|
11 |
+We now arrive...ruler: Being itself. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+**Dislocation within community, undermines difference and identity. JAMES 06:** |
|
14 |
+James, Ian. “The Fragmentary Demand” Stanford University Press 2006. LHP AA |
|
15 |
+The very term community...to another could occur. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+**My framework rejects any binding tastebuds in community. MAY 3:** |
|
18 |
+May, Todd. “Reconsidering Difference: Nancy, Derrida, Levinas, and Deleuze.” Pennsylvania State University. 1997. LHP MK |
|
19 |
+To be in...able common identity. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+**Academic freedom - even ripstein liked this flavor. JOY ‘15:** |
|
22 |
+Punctum Books Nothing Has Yet Been Said: On the Non-Existence of Academic Freedom and the Necessity of Inoperative Community Posted on May 1, 2015 by Eileen Joy. LHP AA |
|
23 |
+An “inoperative community...and also free.¶ |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+**World ordering creates a machinic orientation towards tangibility of fungibility. NAYAR ’99:** |
|
26 |
+Nayar. Jayan. “Orders of Inhumanity.” Vol 9:599. University of Warwick. 1999. LHP MK |
|
27 |
+Truth, as the...objects of ordering. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+**Ugrešić’s poetry on Central European politics is our argument of identity politics. KRANTIĆ:** |
|
30 |
+Krantić, Alma. “Community Outside Communion: Exile as an Inoperative Community in the Works of Dubravka Ugrešić.” Central European University Department of Gender Studies. 2015. LHP MK |
|
31 |
+Ugrešić’s attitude however...disqualified and marginalized. |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+**I defend the resolution as a general principle.** |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+**Restrictions on discourse assume a nostalgic view of what the community ought to look like. DAVIS ’99:** |
|
36 |
+Davis, Diane. “‘Addicted to Love’; Or, Toward an Inessential Solidarity.” Vol. 19 No. 4. 1999. LHP MK |
|
37 |
+Our fix of...processes of identification.17 |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+**Restrictions on free speech try to render the community operative and justifies the logic of facism. JOY ’16:** |
|
40 |
+Joy, Eileen A. “It is the Connection of Desire to Reality that Possesses Revolutionary Force, or, Why I Decided Not to Commit Suicide, After All.” 3rd Annual Sub-conference of the Modern Language Association. January 6-7, 2016. LHP MK |
|
41 |
+As Foucault knew...at the clock |