| ... |
... |
@@ -1,7
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**A Interpretation: the aff must not read a plan inclusive counterplan, read an NC that says the aff is not an emotive statement, and read separate hijacks to the aff framework with a delineated disad.** |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-**A Interpretation: The neg must concede the aff framework as contextualized in the 1AC.** |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-**A Interpretation: All negative advocacies must be defended as unconditional or dispositional.** |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-**A Interpretation: Debaters must read citations for all their evidence and flash it on the speech doc in the first speech.** |