| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+By taking our current views of the world and projecting them into a hypothetical world, we justify certain actions - this hypothetical world reproduces our oppressive assumptions into an ideal world thought as superior to the status quo. NAYAR ’99: |
|
2 |
+Nayar. Jayan. “Orders of Inhumanity.” Vol 9:599. University of Warwick. 1999. LHP MK |
|
3 |
+Truth, as the ground from … and objects of ordering. |
|
4 |
+This imaginative process is embedded in a mindset that excludes and dehumanizes the oppressed groups whose suffering contradicts the ideal world. NAYAR 2: |
|
5 |
+Nayar. Jayan. “Orders of Inhumanity.” Vol 9:599. University of Warwick. 1999. LHP MK |
|
6 |
+Order as Evolutionary Structure: … is now plainly visible 2 |
|
7 |
+The alternative is to reject the fiat and embrace a model of debate where we question assumptions underlining our present world. NAYAR 2: |
|
8 |
+Nayar. Jayan. “Orders of Inhumanity.” Vol 9:599. University of Warwick. 1999. LHP MK |
|
9 |
+The description of the … of critiques of "ordering." |
|
10 |
+The iterative nature of norms means there’s an infinite number of contexts where we evaluate an action. ANDERSON: |
|
11 |
+Anderson, Nicole. “Derrida: Ethics under Erasure.” 2012. LHP MK |
|
12 |
+Transformation is traditionally …will be elaborated on shortly. |