| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,18 @@ |
|
1 |
+Burden: |
|
2 |
+First, police are state entitites (a) they exist because the state employs and funds them (b) textually. REID: |
|
3 |
+Reid, Stephanie. “The Duties of State Police Officers.” Chron. No Date. LHP MK |
|
4 |
+State police officers …to the manufacture or sale of controlled substances. |
|
5 |
+The reasonable aff burden is to prove the state can limit its own power while the neg burden is to prove it cannot |
|
6 |
+1 Real world |
|
7 |
+2 Conceptual necessity |
|
8 |
+3 Hijacks your role of the ballot |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Offense: |
|
11 |
+Now negate, the constitutive feature of the law is that the sovereign can create it, but the sovereign lives outside of the law and has complete control over the government. So, the sovereign is the only authority over the law, creating a state of exception, the state cannot undermine the sovereign in the state of exception. AGAMBEN ‘04: |
|
12 |
+Agamben, Giorgio. “Homo Sacer – Sovereign Power and Bare Life”. Translated by Daniel Heller-Rozan. Published 2004. Bracketed for gendered language. LHP AA |
|
13 |
+The paradox of sovereignty … a "taking of the outside," an exception (Ausnahme). ¶ |
|
14 |
+Two Impacts: |
|
15 |
+1 You negate |
|
16 |
+2 Turns case ~-~-- the aff attempts to limit qualified immunity, but the state is never willing to limit its own power under the state of exception. GUVEN: |
|
17 |
+Guven, Ferit. “Decolonizing Democracy.” Lexington Books. LHP MK |
|
18 |
+The second characteristic …argument against dehumanization. |