| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+Burden: |
|
2 |
+The aff’s burden is to prove that it is possible for the law to be truly objective, and the neg’s burden is to prove otherwise. Prefer: |
|
3 |
+1 The application of qualified immunity requires understanding if the law is objective or subjective. SCHOTT 12: |
|
4 |
+Richard G. Schott, J.D “Qualified Immunity. How It Protects Law Enforcement Officers” 2012. LHP AA |
|
5 |
+The Court then … immunity was appropriate. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+2 Hijacks your ROB |
|
8 |
+3 Reciprocity |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Offense: |
|
11 |
+I contend that it is impossible for the law to be objective. |
|
12 |
+1 There is no accurate representation of the law ~-~-- law is subject in its nature, as individuals mold their interpretation of the law through perception. SINGER: |
|
13 |
+Joseph William Singer. ”The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory”: The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 94, No. 1 (Nov., 1984), pp. 1-70. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. LHP AA |
|
14 |
+The concept of accurate … are based solely on method. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+2 Objectivity is a myth ~-~-- power is fluid and is constitutive of all of our interactions, whether they be with institutions or other subjects; only a fluid conception of power can enable any resistance, this means everything is subjective, including the law. ORME: |
|
17 |
+Orme, Stephen. "Foucault: Subject, Power, Resistance." Academia.edu, LHP RS |
|
18 |
+We must imagine …. us a forever-shifting |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Turns case – reaffirming objectivity of the law precludes the possibility of greater institutional reform, creating violent state action. HENDERSON ’91: |
|
21 |
+Henderson, Lynne. “Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law.” Indiana University School of Law. 1991. LHP’s Pet Mammul |
|
22 |
+The lack of scholarly …meaning and "law "1178 |