Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[34]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[33]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[34]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-07 22:04:13.79
	1	+2016-11-07 22:04:13.0

Caselist.CitesClass[33]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,16 @@
	1	+Interpretation: the aff should only defend enactment of a topical policy option.
	2	+
	3	+Resolved means the affirmative must defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. PARCHER 1:
	4	+(Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html)
	5	+Pardon me if I turn … are answers to a question.
	6	+
	7	+Vote neg:
	8	+1. Fairness is key to engaging a well-prepared opponent – they monopolize strategy and subvert any meaningful neg role. GALLOWAY 07
	9	+Ryan Galloway 7, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007
	10	+Debate as a dialogue sets … benefits of topical advocacy.
	11	+
	12	+2. Only a limited topic of discussion and a clear stasis for both teams provides the necessary and requisite foundation for decision-making and advocacy skills and ensures clash within debates. Steinberg and Freeley ‘8
	13	+*Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND **David L. Steinberg , Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45
	14	+Debate is a means of … in the following discussion.
	15	+
	16	+3. T Version of the aff

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-07 22:04:14.742

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Panel

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Barrington TC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+34

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Doubles

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lake Highland Azbel Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1 - T - Framework

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Apple Valley