| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+Their focus on an ideal framework that the subject functions under as a starting point for normativity fails fails to recognize the way our becoming control us ~-~-- identity should be understood through the fluid relations of the machine. JUN: |
|
2 |
+Jun, Nathan. “Deleuze, Values, and Normativity.”. LHP MK |
|
3 |
+The primary focus of … often novel ways” (May 2005: 125). ¶ |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+They recreate the oppression they try to fight. EVANS 10: |
|
6 |
+Brad Evans, 2010 “Foucault’s Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century,” Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424. |
|
7 |
+Imposing liberalism has … from the analytical arena. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+The alternative is to dismantle the face ~-~-- this undermines the faciality machines that they seek recognition through and their normative value. BIGNALL ’12: |
|
10 |
+Bignall, Simone. “Dismantling the Face: Pluralism and the Politics of Recognition.” University of New South Wales. 2012. LHP MK |
|
11 |
+Deleuze and Guattari assert: ‘If … these principles into practice. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+The role of the ballot is to vote for the better debate that best interrogates the oppressive politics of recognition. MACCORMACK: |
|
14 |
+Maccormack, Patricia “Faciality” http://archeologia.women.it/user/quarta/workshops/spectacles2/patriciamaccormack.htm. LHP AA |
|
15 |
+I would add to this … into the ‘individual’ face |