Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,26 +1,0 @@
1		-====Interp: Debaters attending at least one bid tournament must disclose all broken positions on the NDCA wiki. To clarify, debaters must post tags, cites, and the first and last three words of each card. They must do this at least one hour before the round or at the earliest opportunity after the previous round has ended.====
2		-
3		-====Standards:====
4		-1. Evidence quality – high-quality evidence becomes readily available to everyone.
5		-Nails, Jacob. "A Defense of Disclosure (Including Third-Party Disclosure)." NSD Update. National Symposium for Debate, 18 Mar. 2015. Web. 01 Nov. 2016. http://nsdupdate.com/2013/10/10/a-defense-of-disclosure-including-third-party-disclosure-by-jacob-nails/. ~~Nails is a policy debater on the college circuit.~~
6		-"I fall squarely on the side of disclosure. I find that the largest
7		-AND
8		-an open marketplace of ideas. Quality of evidence increases across the board."
9		-
10		-
11		-2. Research incentives – disclosure incentivizes in-depth research.
12		-Nails, Jacob. "A Defense of Disclosure (Including Third-Party Disclosure)." NSD Update. National Symposium for Debate, 18 Mar. 2015. Web. 01 Nov. 2016. http://nsdupdate.com/2013/10/10/a-defense-of-disclosure-including-third-party-disclosure-by-jacob-nails/. ~~Nails is a policy debater on the college circuit.~~
13		-"In theory, the increased quality of information could trade off with quantity.
14		-AND
15		-backfiles and briefs would have done LD in a long time ago."
16		-
17		-
18		-3. Argumentative responsibility – disclosure prevents arguments that win only because of ambiguity.
19		-Nails, Jacob. "A Defense of Disclosure (Including Third-Party Disclosure)." NSD Update. National Symposium for Debate, 18 Mar. 2015. Web. 01 Nov. 2016. http://nsdupdate.com/2013/10/10/a-defense-of-disclosure-including-third-party-disclosure-by-jacob-nails/. ~~Nails is a policy debater on the college circuit.~~
20		-"Lastly, and to my mind most significantly, disclosure weeds out anti-
21		-AND
22		-responsive when both sides know what they're getting into prior to the round."
23		-
24		-4. Evidence ethics - disclosure improves verifiability of claims made by debaters and prevents miscutting evidence, which is key to education since we need arguments which have verifiable link-chains, and it's key to fairness because someone who wins off a fake strategy is obviously cheating.
25		-
26		-5. Accessibility - disclosure ensures availability of evidence to everyone, not just those big schools that can do a ton of research, as well as equalizes the intelligence disparity between big and small schools.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-01 16:52:30.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Finals

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Klein Galang Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-00 - THEORY - DISCLOSURE

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-All