| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,20 @@ |
|
1 |
+The 1AC remains gripped within the idea of a “progressive” university—that only reifies the commodification of those within the university walls |
|
2 |
+Occupied UC Berkeley ‘09 |
|
3 |
+Occupied UC Berkeley, “The Necrosocial: Civic Life, Social Death, and the UC.” Anti-Capital Projects. 11-18-2009. http://anticapitalprojects.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/the-necrosocial///KOSH-AG |
|
4 |
+In the university we prostrate ourselves before a value of separation, which in reality |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+the positions we thoughtlessly enact. It’s the particular nature of being owned. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Challenges to the university get coopted by power, allowing the university to refine its oppressive regime |
|
9 |
+Occupied UC Berkeley ‘09 |
|
10 |
+Occupied UC Berkeley, “The Necrosocial: Civic Life, Social Death, and the UC.” Anti-Capital Projects. 11-18-2009. http://anticapitalprojects.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/the-necrosocial///KOHS-AG |
|
11 |
+Totally managed death. A machine for administering death, for the proliferation of technologies |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+gets its own designated burial plot. Who doesn’t participate in this graveyard? |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Thus, the alt is to reject the aff and occupy the university—to reject the idea of faux progress within the university. Instead of pleading for reforms, our approach renders the university machine inefficient |
|
16 |
+Communiqués ‘10 |
|
17 |
+Communiqués from Occupied California. “Introduction.” Anti-Capital Projects. 2-15-2010. http://anticapitalprojects.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/communiques-from-occupied-california-introduction///KOHS-AG |
|
18 |
+The radical or anti-reformist position within the movement has often insisted upon a |
|
19 |
+AND |
|
20 |
+current occupation movement attempts to push those objective conditions toward a breaking point. |