| ... |
... |
@@ -1,53
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====The 1AC’s change through language fails – it only leads to a re-articulation of power. The affirmative fails in its problematization – ending "restrictions" on "speech" will only lead to a re-creation of conformity==== |
| 2 |
|
-Massumi 2k |
| 3 |
|
-Massumi, Brian. A Shock to Thought: Expressions after Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge, 2000. Library Genesis. Web. 6 Dec. 2016. ~~Ph.D in French Literature from Yale University. Currently teaching at Université de Montréal, in the Communication Sciences Department. Taught and lectured internationally at Cornell University (2010), European Graduate School (2010), University of Helsinki/Turku (2009), Goldsmiths', University of London (2008) and University of California, Los Angeles (2000). In 2009 / 2010 was a Senior Scholar in Residence at the Society for the Humanities at Cornell University. Author of Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation (2002) and Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts (2011) among other books.~~ (Page xvii) |
| 4 |
|
- "The move to save change by breaking the symmetries at the basis of |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-affect composing forces, not composed forms’ (Deleuze, 1988: 87)." |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-====Free speech is a huge link – it’s a way that the State teaches you to self-regulate. It makes you find oppression palatable – in fact, you come to desire it.==== |
| 10 |
|
-**Colebrook ‘9** |
| 11 |
|
-Colebrook, Claire. Deleuze and Law: Forensic Futures. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print. ~~Claire Colebrook is an English literature professor at the University of Edinburgh as well as a feminist Deleuzian. She is author of New Literary Histories, Ethics and Representation, and Gilles Deleuze.~~ |
| 12 |
|
-"It is all too easy to see the practical consequences of what Deleuze and |
| 13 |
|
-AND |
| 14 |
|
-those bodies to preclude undue intrusion, possibly justifying a right to defence." |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====Philosophy that seeks to uphold communal or democratic values is dead from the start! Your philosophy attempts to create an ideal citizen to operate willingly within the state apparatus but this only works insofar as we become ‘mini-states’ capable of untold fascism. The impact is rabid nationalism and hatred of the Other.==== |
| 18 |
|
-Brian** Massumi** PG 5("A User's Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari")~~Brian Massumi is Professor in the Department of Communication Sciences at the University of Montréal. He is the author of Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation and A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari (MIT Press).'~~ |
| 19 |
|
-The established order, of course: philosophers have traditionally been employees of the State |
| 20 |
|
-AND |
| 21 |
|
-on going as if they hadn't (neo-conservatism and cynical greed). |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
-====The 1AC’s call for state action allows for an ontological restraining of potentiality, justifying endless oppression by the state==== |
| 25 |
|
-Deleuze and Guattari ‘87 |
| 26 |
|
-Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. Minnesota Press. 1987//KOHS-AG |
| 27 |
|
-Georges Dumezil, in his definitive analyses of Indo-European mythology, has shown |
| 28 |
|
-AND |
| 29 |
|
-of another species, another nature, another origin than the State apparatus. |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
-====The state’s regulation of desire and becoming creates a politics of fear in which biopolitical oppression by the state becomes justified in the name of "security" ==== |
| 33 |
|
-Bell ‘07 |
| 34 |
|
-Daniel Bell in 2007 Daniel M., Associate Professor of Theological Ethics, Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, JCRT 8.2 SPRING 2007 55,d http://www.jcrt.org/archives/08.2/. EHS AB |
| 35 |
|
-Like Hobbes and Foucault, Deleuze holds that Life is constituted by motion; specifically |
| 36 |
|
-AND |
| 37 |
|
-we will have to look elsewhere. To this alternative we now turn. |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
- |
| 40 |
|
-====The alt is to embrace of rhizomatic thought. We gesture towards the infinite flow of potentialities that escapes the control of the state apparatus==== |
| 41 |
|
-Lawley ‘05 |
| 42 |
|
-Scott Lawley. "Deleuze’s Rhizome and the Study of Organization: Conceptual Movement and an Open Future." Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science Vol 3 (4). Nottingham Trent University. 2005//KOHS-AG |
| 43 |
|
-The rhizome is prominent amongst a number of Deleuzian philosophical concepts which have been used |
| 44 |
|
-AND |
| 45 |
|
-the rhizome and organization. This is reflected in the subheadings which follow. |
| 46 |
|
- |
| 47 |
|
- |
| 48 |
|
-====Static forms of knowledge have taken over pedagogical spaces. Thus, the ROB: To vote for the debater who best methodologically embraces becoming. ==== |
| 49 |
|
-Humphreys ‘13 |
| 50 |
|
-Chloe Humphreys. "Rhizomatic Writing and Pedagogy: Deleuze andAmp; Guattari and Heidegger." The Journal of Educational Thought (JET) / Revue De La Pensée Éducative, vol. 46, no. 3, 2013, pp. 191–205. www.jstor.org/stable/24713039//KOHS-AG |
| 51 |
|
-Didactic teaching, recursive learning, grand narratives, and linear papers are perhaps the |
| 52 |
|
-AND |
| 53 |
|
-and multiply in ourselves" (Gregoriou, as cited in Allan 2004). |