Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[24]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[24]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-03 15:09:43.658
	1	+2016-12-03 15:09:43.0

Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,32 @@
	1	+====A~~ Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the desirability of topical action and only a topical action- they can’t defend " an affirmation of the Asian responsibility to confront antiblackness – the underlying power structure of white supremacy" in addition to limiting Qualified Immunity====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+==== ‘Resolved’ means a proposal to be enacted by law ====
	5	+Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition
	6	+Definition of the word "resolve," given by Webster is "to express an
	7	+AND
	8	+," which is defined by Bouvier as meaning "to establish by law".
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====C~~ Standards:====
	12	+Institutional engagement. The state is inevitable—learning to speak the language of power creates the only possibility of social change debate can offer. This is best served by imagining the consequences of policy.
	13	+**Mouffe 9 **(Chantal Mouffe, Professor of Political Theory at the Centre for the
	14	+AND
	15	+LT under RoB- disengages from state which is key point to stop oppression
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Ground – Violations of competitive equity prevent effective dialogue and participation.====
	19	+**Galloway 07**. Ryan** **Galloway; Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate; Vol. 28, 2007
	20	+Debate as a dialogue sets an argumentative table, where all parties receive a relatively
	21	+AND
	22	+.
	23	+Subverts dialogue- kills opposition which is a bad form of pedagogy
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+====TVA: limit QI for police officers that are of color, ====
	27	+Resolves all of your analysis and challenging whiteness internal links- A) means that it’s a stand against the white system that pushes down people of color and allows Asian police officers to separate themselves from whiteness. B) Also means that the white officers would be convicted just like the example cited in the aff
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+====limit QI for all police officers only ====
	31	+Equalizes the playing field because White officers already have functional QI- best to equalize the field –
	32	+DA to their methodology and a reason why their politics is bad and skews engagement- FW is a net benefit to any of the advocacies.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-03 15:09:44.219

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Koshak

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Collegiate

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+15

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kinkaid Yang Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1- Framework

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Univ of Texas