Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,14 +1,0 @@
1		-====TEXT – the 50 States should do '''''''''''''''''''''''
2		-
3		-====States set binding precedent –CP fiats federal courts consistently deny appeals ====
4		-,,Michael S.,, **Catlett 05,** ,,JD, University of Arizona College of Law, "Clearly Not Established: Decisional Law and the Qualified Immunity Doctrine," Arizona Law Review Vol. 47, 2005.,,
5		-2. Has the Constitutional Right Been Pronounced In Binding Precedent? When binding
6		-AND
7		-, the nonexistence of such precede.nt does not end the inquiry.
8		-
9		-
10		-====States CP solves better====
11		-Thompson 15, ,,Legislative Attorney, 2015 ~~Police Use of Force: Rules, Remedies, and Reforms, Richard M. Thompson II, Legislative Attorney October 30, 2015, Congressional Research Service 7-5700, www.crs.gov, R44256~~,,
12		-These reforms prompt the perennial debate concerning the role of Congress in addressing police reform
13		-AND
14		-not adequately held their officers legally accountable for the improper use of force.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-19 18:29:07.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Sun

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lakeville South

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-10

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Kinkaid Yang Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NOV DEC 50 States CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-The Glenbrooks